Grooming: five issues were fixed and never closed, and one is not
088, 089, 120, 128 and 130 each name a commit that is on main and cites them — the forge's address following a moved port, a route naming its endpoint, a provisioner asking the backend what is there, the hosts file written into a marked block, and undeclaring giving a unit back the state it was found in. Each says it was closed by reading commits rather than by a run, so nobody reads a green that was never measured. 129 stays located on purpose: ca-trust is merged and no machine holds it, so the symptom it opened on is still true everywhere.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
status: located
|
||||
status: resolved
|
||||
fixed-by: mesh-host 1cb8953 and fdc768c — the mesh writes into a marked block of a text file instead of over it
|
||||
opened: 2026-09-26
|
||||
located-in: [mesh-controller internal/catalogue/facts.go, mesh-host internal/apply]
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -71,3 +72,9 @@ private network loses that name too.
|
||||
- The host's file resource supports `into: "json"` only; anything else is a whole write.
|
||||
- `node show <node>` on the adopted workstation: `holds file /etc/hosts
|
||||
mesh-wireguard.fact-node-names`, original kept.
|
||||
|
||||
## Closed
|
||||
|
||||
*2026-09-29, in a grooming pass rather than by whoever fixed it.* A shared hosts file keeps every line that is not the mesh's. Found by
|
||||
reading what the code repositories' commits cite: the fix names this issue and is on `main`. It was
|
||||
not re-verified on a machine, and this record says so rather than implying a run that did not happen.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user