Order the records the way the system is learned
Jochen asked whether the order made sense. It did not -- it followed when things happened to be decided, which after consolidation is fictional anyway since record 5 alone folds decisions taken across a week. Concretely wrong before: the domain statement sat at 8, after five engineering rules; the constitution was scattered across 5, 12 and 17; the tiers landed at 15, 16, 21 and 22 with process records in between. Now it walks: what the mesh is (1-3), its tiers from the bottom up (4-8), what runs on them and how it gets there (9-10), how it is built (11-16), how it is checked (17-18), how we work (19-23). Two things made this safe rather than free. It is a permutation, not a compaction, so the renames go through temporary names -- otherwise two files want one slot and one is lost. And the reference rewrite is a single simultaneous pass, because almost every number moved into a slot another number was vacating; replacing one at a time would have cascaded and pointed things at the wrong record while still resolving. Verified: 284 [ADR NNNN](path) links across the repository, all with matching text and target. The ordering principle is now stated in 19 rather than left implicit -- the repository already said "the numbering is the flow" about its folders, and there was no reason for the records to be the exception.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -237,6 +237,6 @@ returns. That mechanism is the subject of a separate ADR.
|
||||
pipeline resolves dependencies across the registry rather than the filesystem?
|
||||
4. **SDK residue** — after extraction, does `hal/sdk` keep transport (`amqp-client`), or
|
||||
does that belong to `hal/stream`? Everything imports it, which argues both ways.
|
||||
5. **Human agent modality.** ADR 0008 requires a fact the mesh does not record: which
|
||||
5. **Human agent modality.** ADR 0001 requires a fact the mesh does not record: which
|
||||
user, on which node, a human agent acts as. Where does it live — an attribute of the
|
||||
agent, or of the agent-node binding?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user