diff --git a/02-DECISIONS/0277-a-trusted-setting-is-proposed-through-a-verb-and-set-on-the-operators-warrant-and-a-modules-own-secret-is-asked-for-and-typed-at-the-desk.md b/02-DECISIONS/0277-a-trusted-setting-is-proposed-through-a-verb-and-set-on-the-operators-warrant-and-a-modules-own-secret-is-asked-for-and-typed-at-the-desk.md
index 7df874a7..d1b3fef4 100644
--- a/02-DECISIONS/0277-a-trusted-setting-is-proposed-through-a-verb-and-set-on-the-operators-warrant-and-a-modules-own-secret-is-asked-for-and-typed-at-the-desk.md
+++ b/02-DECISIONS/0277-a-trusted-setting-is-proposed-through-a-verb-and-set-on-the-operators-warrant-and-a-modules-own-secret-is-asked-for-and-typed-at-the-desk.md
@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ controller ask it. Nothing bounded how often it could be asked.
    fingerprint, and where the whole is read.** Chosen. "recalbox=smb://host/share@/mnt/recalbox" is shown as
    "recalbox=‹address›@‹path›", and `settings proposals <id>` shows it whole, with the same fingerprint.
 
+   > **Progressive insight — 2026-10-10.** Issue 383 in the issue tracker: the first proposals reached the
+   > operator's phone as "+ shares: media=‹path›", and the operator said they could not see what they were being
+   > asked to approve: a mount point, a share name or a private address is the thing being approved. Option 1 was
+   > rejected on the fact that the content rule refuses a path or an address "in any message that leaves the
+   > mesh"; the operator decided, and the rule now reads, that on a channel that proves who answers
+   > (`verified-sender`, Telegram today) the exact values are shown WHOLE, and only a value shaped like a secret
+   > is withheld there — the ask carries its explanation twice (the SDK's `Whole` beside `Explanation`), the
+   > router shows the whole only on such a channel and holds it to the secret rule alone, and refuses the ask as
+   > a whole when a secret's shape is left in it. Option 3 stands as decided for every channel that proves
+   > nothing (the desk) and for every condition's words. The decision stands: the operator reads the exact
+   > change and approves it; what changed is where the values may be read whole.
+
 ### Where the record of the set is kept
 
 1. **A seat event of the controller's own**, beside the hand-act log. Rejected for now: nothing consumes it, and
@@ -131,6 +143,14 @@ One ask per proposal, published under the controller's name on the `operator-cha
   hexadecimal digits of its digest, in groups of four); when a part is not shown, where the whole is read
   (`settings proposals <id>`, through the mesh MCP server or `mesh-cli`), whose fingerprint must be the one on
   the phone; and that, approved, the layer is set at once and the machine takes it at its next push;
+
+  > **Progressive insight — 2026-10-10.** Issue 383: on the phone this read as one wall of text. The
+  > explanation is now the change alone — one line per key as above, then "Proposed by <who> at <time>" — and
+  > the router adds what every ask says (who asks, what each answer does, when it expires); on a channel that
+  > proves who answers the values are whole, as the insight above says. The fingerprint, where the whole is
+  > read and that the layer is set at once moved to the **Details** answer the ask's own message offers (the
+  > SDK's `Details`), shown line by line under the content rule. The telegram channel shows every message
+  > formatted, never reworded: the headline bold, a key line and a fingerprint in monospace, its markup escaped.
 - **two options, Approve and Decline, both at the level approve**, as the controller's rehearsal asks, so only a
   channel that proves who answered carries either. Each binds the digest of its act: the proposal's id, the
   answer, the module, the machine, the digest of the exact values, the digest of the layer they replace,
@@ -226,6 +246,7 @@ channel as every given secret is.
 |---|---|
 | A proposal changes nothing, and asks at the level approve with the exact change | the controller's test: the ask passes the SDK's check, offers Approve and Decline both at the level approve, each binding an act digest; the explanation carries each key with its value or its shape, the layer's fingerprint and the "was" of a changed key, and passes the content rule; the kept record is the controller's own, and no layer is set (`TestAProposalAsksAtTheLevelApproveWithTheExactChange`, `TestAClearIsProposedAndShowsWhatItRemoves`) |
 | What the phone is shown keeps a value's shape and passes the content rule | `TestAValueIsShownInItsShapeAndPassesTheContentRule` |
+| On a channel that proves who answers the values are whole and only a secret's shape is withheld; elsewhere they keep their shape; the message carries no fingerprint and no how-to (the insight of 2026-10-10) | the controller's `TestAProposalShowsItsValuesWholeOnlyWhereTheSenderIsProvenAndNeverASecret` (the masked and the whole change differ in exactly the masked lines); the router's `TestAnAsksWholeWordsAreShownWhereTheSenderIsProvenAndMaskedElsewhere` and `TestAnAskWhoseWholeWordsCarryASecretIsRefused`; the telegram channel's `TestAMessageIsRenderedInHTMLWithItsMarkupEscaped` |
 | A layer the mesh would refuse, or a silent removal, is not asked | `TestAProposalTheMeshWouldRefuseIsNotAsked` |
 | The layer is set once, on the operator's approval, with who approved it; a replay changes nothing | `TestTheLayerIsSetOnceOnTheOperatorsApproval`: the warrant heard twice sets once, no verb is called, the hand-act reads `warrant` with the answer and the values' digest, and counts as a person's decision |
 | Decline, expiry, cancel, replacement and the router's refusal discard | `TestDeclineExpiryAndRefusalDiscardAProposal`, each outcome, and an approval after the end refused |
diff --git a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/46-the-conversation-with-the-operator.md b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/46-the-conversation-with-the-operator.md
index 705fa4f3..cdd903c6 100644
--- a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/46-the-conversation-with-the-operator.md
+++ b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/46-the-conversation-with-the-operator.md
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ withdrawn from routing and reported until it passes. A new word is a new version
 | | `operator-first` | the operator can write unprompted | a simulated message yields a `message` envelope |
 | trusting | `verified-sender` | the answer came from the operator's own account, through a holder no agent shares | a choice from an identity not on the list is dropped and reported; placement checked |
 | | `exact-render` | the ask is shown as the router rendered it | rendered text equals the router's, byte for byte |
+| | | *Amended 2026-10-10 (issue 383):* a channel may format the router's words (Telegram: the title bold, a key line and a fingerprint in monospace) and escapes its markup; it never rewords them | the words, formatting aside, equal the router's byte for byte — what a tap on the message is compared by |
 | | `code-factor` | a typed code reaches the router by request and reply, never judged by the holder | a code never appears in an event; it is deleted from the conversation where the service allows |
 | | `key-factor` | a security key's assertion over the router's challenge reaches the router | the challenge is the router's; the signature is checked by the router |
 
@@ -303,6 +304,13 @@ is not exempted.
 - **A refusal is said to the sender** — the `notify` call or the ask is refused naming
   the offending part, so the asker can rephrase or move the specific into a reference — and raises
   `channel-refused`. The offending part is never sent to a channel.
+- *Amended 2026-10-10, [ADR 0277](../../02-DECISIONS/0277-a-trusted-setting-is-proposed-through-a-verb-and-set-on-the-operators-warrant-and-a-modules-own-secret-is-asked-for-and-typed-at-the-desk.md)'s progressive insight (issue 383):* **an ask may carry its explanation
+  whole** (`Whole` beside `Explanation`), its paths and addresses as they are: what the operator approves must be
+  readable where they approve it. The router shows the whole only on an ask's own message, on a kind declaring
+  `verified-sender` that was given the ask's answers, and holds it to the secret rule alone; a secret's shape in
+  it refuses the ask as a whole. The rule above holds for everything else: every condition's words, and every
+  kind that proves nothing. An ask may also say what its **Details** answer shows (`Details`), held to the rule
+  line by line.
 
 ### References