Design 25: answer the third review (views families on the old streams sections under a record extending ADR 0595 §10, the tool runner's first-view tools on the mesh MCP server, the running judge takes the process-subject form in)

The assigner must start on a fresh mesh before the bus module can answer, so its new stream
stays on its old section; a new indexer can never judge its own manifest, so the running judge
must accept the form first. The glossary stops counting the mesh MCP server's tools.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
This commit is contained in:
2026-11-04 00:46:25 +01:00
parent a9745b63cb
commit 546a18a20e
2 changed files with 43 additions and 21 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ asking, never the act. **Decided by** ADR 0152, 0175, 0234, 0259, 0272, 0383, 03
**Uses:** operator, person, node, module, seat, tool (Module), proof and identity (Identity and access), release (Delivery).
- **mesh MCP server** — the endpoint on a node's loopback through which every agent and person on that
node reaches the mesh: the MCP server named `mesh`, with its five tools `mesh_overview`,
node reaches the mesh: the MCP server named `mesh`, with its tools, among them `mesh_overview`,
`mesh_machine`, `mesh_search`, `mesh_describe` and `mesh_call`. It is the tool runner's loopback mode,
not a module of its own. "Console" suggested a terminal or a shell, and the module `mesh-console` it
once named no longer exists; "the tool bridge" and "the brain" named the predecessor's program.