From 5f6d71da213bf97c734ad3cad4b34527234d0fa3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jochen Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:51:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Answer A-266: no holder names the gate's approvals verb Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfGKaxw984XyAPfLm4h --- 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/47-milestones/G-22-lead-answers-2.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/47-milestones/G-22-lead-answers-2.md b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/47-milestones/G-22-lead-answers-2.md index 58d77fb0..1e4e84cf 100644 --- a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/47-milestones/G-22-lead-answers-2.md +++ b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/47-milestones/G-22-lead-answers-2.md @@ -329,3 +329,5 @@ the principle that settles it, cited as "design 47 G A-n". tool bundle holds the seat (the login shell's `execute`), the tool runner, which already holds that bundle's gate, answers the marked verb by caller and serves `approvals` for the seats its bundles hold, as `AnswerSeat` does for a process; no holder changes and no mark moves. +- **A-266** (A-264, A-265, ADR 0132; principle 7) `approvals` is the gate's verb, served wherever a marked verb is: + `CanHold` and the validator's same rule ask no holder to name it in its claim's `serves` or its tools.