Issues 143 and 144 resolved: the live row of ADR 0168 read on the home server and the control node

04-ISSUES/143-converging-does-not-retire-the-firewall-it-found/00-report.md

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 ---
-status: located
+status: resolved
 opened: 2026-09-29
 located-in:
   - mesh-host internal/apply/opening.go (retireFirewall)
   - mesh-host internal/apply/apply.go (the condition it is called under)
-fixed-by:
+fixed-by: mesh-host 67 (retire on every converged apply; found-inactive apart from disabled-by-mesh; a skipped step said), mesh-controller 211 (the found firewall's state on node show)
 amended-design:
 ---
 
@@ -108,3 +108,13 @@ convergence is a state the host keeps — the found firewall active again is ret
 reconcile that finds it inactive records *found so* and never *done by the mesh*, and a step skipped
 after a failed apply is said. Built in mesh-host on `feat/one-thing-filters-a-converged-machine`; the
 record of both machines of this mesh is corrected by the first report under it.
+
+## Resolved, 2026-10-02
+
+mesh-host 67 and mesh-controller 211, live on every machine at 10:10Z. The step now runs on every
+converged apply and says what it did; a found firewall enabled again is retired again. The record's
+one inherited lie stands as history: on the control node the machine's own record already said the
+mesh had disabled the firewall, and the host trusts its record, so `node show` says "retired by the
+mesh" there. From this build on, a reconcile that finds the firewall inactive records *found inactive*
+and never the other thing. Whether the flip's step took on 2026-09-29 is not recoverable and is not
+owed by this record any more.

04-ISSUES/144-the-predecessors-rules-outlive-the-firewall-it-was-found-as/00-report.md

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 ---
-status: located
+status: resolved
 opened: 2026-09-29
 located-in:
   - mesh-host internal/apply/opening.go
   - mesh-controller cmd/mesh-controller (the converge preview)
-fixed-by:
+fixed-by: mesh-host 67 (every refusing table and legacy chain classified with an owner; the runtime's user chain is other), mesh-controller 211 (kept, shown on node show, named by status, previewed with fates)
 amended-design:
 ---
 
@@ -91,3 +91,15 @@ chain's refusals as *other*; `node show`, `status` and the converge preview say
 `feat/one-thing-filters-a-converged-machine` in mesh-host and mesh-controller. On 2026-10-02 the home
 server still carries the predecessor's chain in its legacy filter; the record's live row is reading it
 there.
+
+## Resolved, 2026-10-02
+
+mesh-host 67 and mesh-controller 211, live at 10:10Z. The live row of
+[ADR 0168](../../02-DECISIONS/0168-a-converged-machine-is-filtered-by-the-mesh-alone.md) was read the
+same hour: the home server's record names the predecessor's chain in the legacy filter's user chain
+as *other*, with what it refuses, beside two chains a retired front end left in the IPv6 legacy filter;
+the control node's record names the same two leftovers; the laptop and the workstation read *the mesh
+alone*. `status` names both machines and is not well until the operator removes what the mesh did not
+write. The allowance the predecessor's chain carried is
+[issue 145](../145-a-machine-reads-healthy-while-its-modules-cannot-reach-each-other/00-report.md)'s,
+and that record is not closed by this one.