ADR 0084: a pin names the module as well as the node (#258)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -106,3 +106,14 @@ is refused with the candidates named, never resolved by picking.
|
|||||||
gap, and the day-one evidence.
|
gap, and the day-one evidence.
|
||||||
- [`03-DESIGN/01-to-be/23-choosing-a-provider.md`](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/23-choosing-a-provider.md)
|
- [`03-DESIGN/01-to-be/23-choosing-a-provider.md`](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/23-choosing-a-provider.md)
|
||||||
— the design.
|
— the design.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **Widened, 2026-10-01 (issue #258).** The pin named a node, on the reasoning that "the same
|
||||||
|
> module on two machines is two answers, and which machine is the whole question". Half right:
|
||||||
|
> two modules on one machine can both answer a provision — `public-acme` and `step-ca` both offer
|
||||||
|
> `acme-ca` on novox — and then which *module* is the whole question, and a node alone cannot ask
|
||||||
|
> it. A provider is a (node, module) pair ([design 23](../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/23-choosing-a-provider.md)),
|
||||||
|
> and a pin now names the pair: `pin <node> <provision> <from-node> <module>`. The resolver
|
||||||
|
> refuses a node that answers twice instead of taking the last one listed, and refuses two
|
||||||
|
> providers beside the consumer instead of settling them by a map walk — the same stance design 23
|
||||||
|
> takes: ambiguity is refused, never resolved by picking. Records made before are completed by
|
||||||
|
> migration where the node they name answers once. mesh-controller: `feat/pin-names-the-provider`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user