Merge pull request 'Playbooks 07 and 08: after a failed try, a local run of the integration level is a good first step (guideline)' (#471) from pb/try-fails-run-locally into main

Reviewed-on: #471

00-META/process/07-feature-branches.md

@@ -184,10 +184,14 @@ issue whether it is being fixed in between, after the delivery, or waits, and on
   message ("issue 805: landing in mesh-catalog"); reach the mesh only through the mesh MCP server, never ssh;
   never push, open, merge or close a pull request; never write to a store's database by hand, a schema change
   is a numbered migration and the consolidated schema; Go only unless the context file says otherwise; never
-  move another issue; **never run an integration test on the machine** (no `go test -tags integration`,
+  move another issue; **leave the integration tests to the try while developing** (no `go test -tags integration`,
   no store or bus started by hand): compile them with `go vet -tags integration ./...` and leave the running to
   the lead's try at the end of this step, where `mesh-controller.try` runs them on the pushed branch. On 2026-10-17 three fixing agents ran them anyway, one for minutes on end, because the
-  brief only said they wait for the check (the operator). Report back in under 150 words: commits, tests added and that they failed first, the
+  brief only said they wait for the check (the operator). After a failed try or check it
+  usually pays to run that repository's whole integration level locally (`go test -tags integration -count=1 ./...` in each
+  module), by the lead or by the fixing agent on the lead's word, before another try: a verdict names only the first failed
+  test (issue 1921), and on 2026-10-23 R4g's faults surfaced one per try until a local run listed them all in a minute (a
+  guideline, the operator). Report back in under 150 words: commits, tests added and that they failed first, the
   check results, anything you stopped on.
 - **An agent that finds the code differs from its context file stops and reports** (file:line); the lead
   settles it, updates the context file, and continues the agent.
@@ -250,8 +254,9 @@ issue whether it is being fixed in between, after the delivery, or waits, and on
    stream (ADR 0525 §1), so it waits behind the asks before it until a build node has a free slot; no script of the repository decides
    it (ADR 0445, ADR 0529). A try that fails goes to step 3 item 3 as a failed check does; the pull requests are opened only
    when every head's last try passed (the operator, 2026-10-18: three pushes in a row failed their first merge check on
-   faults a try finds in minutes). Never `go test -tags integration` or a store or bus started
+   faults a try finds in minutes). While developing, no `go test -tags integration` or store or bus started
-   by hand on the machine (the operator, 2026-10-18). Pull requests in two or
+   by hand on the machine (the operator, 2026-10-18); after a failed try, a local run of the whole level is the guideline
+   in step 1's brief. Pull requests in two or
    more repositories that share the branch name are one delivery group (ADR 0239 §2).
    Where a session pushes through the forge tool `gitea_commit` (one commit on the forge's current base), the
    reviewer first confirms that commit's tree equals the reviewed one. **A large change is pushed by a pusher agent** on the smaller

00-META/process/08-small-fixes.md

@@ -61,8 +61,11 @@ one delivery**. Everything before the try is local and fast.
 5. **Push the reviewed head, try it again if the review changed it, and open the pull request.** The trunk is what runs and nothing holds merged work back
    (ADR 0401), so a fix waits for no other change's delivery. `mesh-controller.try` on the pushed branch runs
    the integration tests, and the pull request is opened only when the head's last try passed; the checker's merge check runs
-   them again as the gate (playbook [07](07-feature-branches.md) step 3). They are never run on the machine. A
+   them again as the gate (playbook [07](07-feature-branches.md) step 3). A failed try or check is best run locally
-   failed try or check goes back to the same agent with the failure, and the reviewer reads only the change it makes.
+   first: the repository's whole integration level (`go test -tags integration -count=1 ./...` in each module) shows every
+   failure at once, where a verdict names only the first (issue 1921) and a try per fault costs a round each (a guideline,
+   the operator, 2026-10-23). The failures go back to the same agent, fixed in one change where they can be, and the
+   reviewer reads only the change it makes, before the next try.
 6. **The pull request's description carries the review record** (`Reviewed-by: <who@node> at <full sha>`,
    playbook [07](07-feature-branches.md) step 3) and the session that pushed it (`Pushed-by: <who@node>`, ADR 0505 §5), and mesh-delivery asks the operator's Approve as soon as its
    checks pass and merges the approved head (ADR 0421); nobody marks, labels, comments or rechecks. A fix to a module that changes how it runs carries an