diff --git a/04-ISSUES/122-a-module-cannot-ask-for-its-own-public-name/00-report.md b/04-ISSUES/122-a-module-cannot-ask-for-its-own-public-name/00-report.md
index 2621b4f..0045a88 100644
--- a/04-ISSUES/122-a-module-cannot-ask-for-its-own-public-name/00-report.md
+++ b/04-ISSUES/122-a-module-cannot-ask-for-its-own-public-name/00-report.md
@@ -24,6 +24,17 @@ the only way to make the software work:
 No reviewer introduced these carelessly: each is the value the software needs, and there is nowhere
 else to put it.
 
+**And they are not the first.** Asked whether merging them would set a precedent, the catalogue
+answered no: **five modules already on the main branch carry one**. The clearest is the workflow
+automation module, whose environment file states its host, its protocol and a full absolute webhook
+URL as literals; two more — the proxy and the builder — carry a complete clone URL for a repository
+on this mesh's own forge, scheme, host and port included.
+
+So the three under review are the visible edge of a pattern the catalogue already follows, which
+changes what this issue is for. It is not a matter of refusing three changes; there is no version of
+this catalogue today that does not name the mesh it was written in, and a mechanism is the only
+thing that removes any of them.
+
 ## What the mesh offers instead, and why none of it answers
 
 A manifest may interpolate `${secret:…}`, `${seat:…}`, `${bound:…}`, `${port:…}` and