The operator's agent is a module: three records and to-be 36 for the claude-code successor
The predecessor's agent module was retired and its six files stayed on both workstations telling every session to use tools that no longer exist. Before a successor module is written, the design needs the decisions it rests on and nothing in the record stated them: - ADR 0169 (reconstructed) records what the controller shipped on 2026-09-27 without a record: the operator account is a node fact stated by the operator, the home is derived unless stated, a resource may be placed under it owned by the account, and a node with no account refuses one. - ADR 0170 generalises to-be 29 §3's found-vs-owned boundary to every directory under a home: the module owns the directory and the files it places, writes into the tool's own files for its few keys, never declares a credential's content, and holds everything else as found — a predecessor's leftovers included, which the operator removes once. - ADR 0171 draws the licence line the operator asked to have drawn rather than assumed: the mesh binds and delivers (to-be 14 and 15 stand), the module alone writes the credential file, refresh stays central (ADR 0050), a switch is the binding changed through a controller seat verb asked for via the console, and the token-carrying shell helper is retired. The controller learns nothing about the agent; that is what "no part" means. To-be 36 is the module's design: the ownership map per path, the fate of the six predecessor files, what the three instruction documents say, the licence tools and skill, the console as a node-scoped provision, the package gap stated honestly, and the order of the build. To-be 14, 29 and 34 carry dated notes; the glossary gains "operator account".
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ another — and a mesh you cannot name precisely is a mesh two people describe d
|
||||
|
||||
- **node** — a machine in the mesh. There are 0..n of them, and each runs the host agent. A node is
|
||||
just a machine that has joined; being one implies nothing about what it runs.
|
||||
- **operator account** — the login name of the person who works on a node, stated on the node
|
||||
record; empty for a machine nobody logs into. Everything the mesh places under a person's home is
|
||||
resolved against this account's home and owned by it
|
||||
([ADR 0169](../02-DECISIONS/0169-the-operator-account-is-a-node-fact-and-a-home-is-a-placement-root.md)).
|
||||
Not "the user" (ambiguous with a module's own account) and not a name a definition carries.
|
||||
- **control-node** — the one node that also holds the `mesh-controller` seat. There is exactly one
|
||||
per mesh. "control-node" is not a separate kind of machine — it is a node that additionally runs
|
||||
the controller (and, today, the foundation). Lose it and the other nodes keep running what they
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user