Fix what the records review found

The glossary's authority page still named the controller's seat the-controller in two entries, contradicting its own seat section after ADR 0079; issue 058's heading kept the pre-renumber 059; 055's fixed-by named branches that stop existing after merge (now merge commits/PRs) and its located-in listed file paths where the convention wants repos; 056's located-in named mesh-host, which received no fix, instead of mesh-catalog; and the design layer never said the one-store/one-broker property is enforced — 07-the-foundation and the installation table now state the seats. https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 22:24:57 +02:00
parent 5856555390
commit 94fee5d849
6 changed files with 15 additions and 10 deletions
@@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ decisions:

 # The foundation

+**One store, one broker — enforced, not conventional.** Each foundation module claims a
+mesh-scoped seat named after its server (`mesh-store`, `mesh-broker`, `mesh-controller` —
+[ADR 0079](../../02-DECISIONS/0079-the-foundation-seats-are-named-after-their-servers.md)), so
+assigning a second holder anywhere in the mesh is refused at resolution rather than silently
+raising a second server.
+
 Tier 1. Defined the same way [the controller](06-the-controller.md) is, because the same
 gap applied: the word was load-bearing and unpinned.