031 — a machine becomes each thing it was told, in turn

Declarations queue and the host applies all of them, oldest first, so a
machine pushed five things in a minute spends five applies becoming the
last one. Correct every step — each declaration is the whole machine —
and wasted in all but the final step.

Only visible since a report names its declaration: the reports arriving
were about ever-older ones, while timestamp comparisons used to happen
to pass. The fix is consumption order, not the queue; the open question
is what a superseded declaration's report should say, because silence
reads as disobedience and "applied" would be a lie.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-02 01:06:12 +02:00
parent 6bdd3f2bfa
commit 9638aa02c5
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
status: open
opened: 2026-09-02
located-in: [mesh-host]
fixed-by:
amended-design:
---
# 031 — A machine becomes each thing it was told, in turn
## Symptom
A machine that was pushed several declarations in quick succession applies every one of them,
oldest first, at the better part of a minute each. Under the lab's suite — twenty-odd pushes in
fifteen minutes — the anchor machine ran minutes behind the newest declaration, and a test that
waited for it honestly timed out while the machine was busy becoming things nobody wanted any
more.
Only visible since caught-up became an equality: each report now names the declaration it applied,
and the reports arriving were about ever-older ones. Before that, the same backlog hid inside
timestamp comparisons that happened to pass.
## Why it is wrong, and why it is also right
Each declaration is complete — the whole machine, not a delta — so applying an old one is never
*incorrect*, only wasted: the machine converges to a state the mesh has already moved past, then
does it again. The queue keeps a disconnected machine's instructions safe, which is right. What
is wrong is only the order of consumption: **a machine asked to be five successive things should
become the last one.**
## The shape of a fix
On waking with a queue, drain it and apply only the newest declaration; acknowledge the
superseded ones without applying them. Whether a superseded declaration deserves a report — and
what its outcome should be called — is the real question for the link's vocabulary: silence reads
as a machine that ignored an instruction, and "applied" would be a lie.
## What it costs today
Nothing on a real mesh at rest: pushes are far apart. It costs the lab about a doubling of one
test's wait, and it will cost a real mesh exactly when things are busiest — a flurry of changes is
when a machine can least afford to replay history.