diff --git a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md
index 385cd44..81e1084 100644
--- a/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md
+++ b/03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md
@@ -129,6 +129,35 @@ two paths would mean one of them silently swallowing traffic.
 **What the host receives:** an interface configuration and a peer list, as files. It does not
 compute them, and after this it holds no credential to the mesh's database.
 
+### Four things the lab found, none of them visible from the mesh's own state
+
+*Written 2026-08-29, on the first three machines to actually run this.*
+
+Each looked like a working network from every angle the mesh can see: the graph was right, the
+files were right, the services were up, and every node reported success.
+
+- **A running interface does not re-read its configuration.** A node joins, every existing node's
+  peer list changes, each file is replaced — and the service is already running, so nothing
+  reloads it. Every existing node keeps a network that no longer exists. The declaration has to
+  say the service must *reflect* the file, which is declared state; a command to restart would be
+  an action, and the link may not carry one
+  ([ADR 0005](../../02-DECISIONS/0005-the-node-host.md)).
+- **A hub that shares a site with a spoke was emitted twice** — once as a direct peer and once as
+  the route of last resort. WireGuard takes one entry per public key, so the interface refuses the
+  file. The ordinary shape of a small mesh, and in none of the tests written before it ran.
+- **Two nodes at one site that neither can be dialled must not peer directly.** Nobody opens the
+  path, and the direct route is more specific than the hub's, so it wins and blackholes. This
+  document's own warning, arriving in its implementation: *a more specific route to a dead
+  endpoint blackholes; it does not fall back to the general one.*
+- **The container runtime closes the door the overlay needs.** Docker sets the FORWARD policy to
+  DROP, so a hub with `ip_forward` enabled still carries nothing between its spokes. The substrate
+  at tier 1 silently breaks the network at tier 2, and nothing in either tier's state says so. The
+  hub inserts its own rule above those chains and removes it on the way down.
+
+**The pattern in all four:** the mesh's picture of the network was correct and the network did not
+work. That is the argument for the lab in one line — none of these is reachable by reasoning, and
+each was found within minutes of a real machine trying it.
+
 ## 2 — Resolution
 
 **Two name spaces, and they do not mix:**