Issue 020 resolved: the symptom was the bed's, proven against Pebble and step-ca alike
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
status: open
|
status: resolved
|
||||||
opened: 2026-08-31
|
opened: 2026-08-31
|
||||||
located-in: [mesh-control, mesh-lab]
|
located-in: [mesh-control, mesh-lab]
|
||||||
fixed-by:
|
fixed-by: mesh-lab multiple-fixes — the bed, not the proxy: its backend stub never listened and its check read a subject the authority leaves empty; against both Pebble and the catalogue's step-ca the same proxy now orders, answers the challenge, is issued and serves
|
||||||
amended-design:
|
amended-design:
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Diagnosis — 2026-09-21
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. The report's own remedy was taken: the same order against a second ACME implementation. The
|
||||||
|
catalogue's own certificate authority, step-ca, was raised in the bed beside Pebble, pinned as
|
||||||
|
the catalogue pins it, and the same proxy pointed at it over the same challenge path. It issued
|
||||||
|
within a second of the order.
|
||||||
|
2. The name was still not served, and the reason was neither authority's: the bed's stand-in
|
||||||
|
backend, a netcat loop behind the route, used flags this machine's netcat has not got and never
|
||||||
|
listened. Every request through the proxy was refused by the backend after a completed
|
||||||
|
handshake, which read as "never served over TLS" — and, against Pebble, had hidden behind
|
||||||
|
whatever Pebble refused first. Replaced with a real small server.
|
||||||
|
3. With a backend that answers, Pebble issued too. The last failure was the bed's check that the
|
||||||
|
certificate is for the name: it read the subject, which Pebble — like the public authority it
|
||||||
|
stands in for — leaves empty, putting the name in the alternative names alone.
|
||||||
|
4. So the symptom was the bed's, twice over, and the proxy's ACME client is right against both
|
||||||
|
implementations. Ruled out: a Pebble interop detail, and a fault in the client's order or
|
||||||
|
challenge handling.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Located in:** the certificate bed. Both authorities remain in it: Pebble because it models the
|
||||||
|
public authority's strictness, step-ca because it is what a mesh runs.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user