ADR 0152: the operator's surface is a module, the console
The work order's group-3 question answered: an ordinary module the mesh assigns to the machine a person sits at, holding a minted credential, calling tools under a manifest grant (invokes), serving MCP on loopback. Design 34; pointers in 33, 25 and 0095; module check designed into 12 (issue 148); README stops claiming an indexing nothing provides (issue 006).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -87,12 +87,15 @@ rather than location** — that these documents would be indexed into the knowle
|
||||
symptom search returns them beside everything else. One source, many surfaces. Where the source
|
||||
is authored is then a separate question.
|
||||
|
||||
**That indexing does not exist.** It was checked on 2026-08-23 and returns nothing; it appears
|
||||
never to have existed. Until it does, the objection stands unanswered and this repository is
|
||||
the fourth knowledge system it was argued not to be. Recorded as
|
||||
[`04-ISSUES/006`](04-ISSUES/006-hq-is-not-indexed-into-the-knowledge-base/00-report.md), and
|
||||
left standing here rather than quietly reworded, because a claim that held up a decision and
|
||||
was never checked is precisely the failure this repository exists to name.
|
||||
**That indexing never existed, and the store it would have indexed into is gone.** It was checked
|
||||
on 2026-08-23 and returned nothing; the knowledge base it named was the predecessor's, and since the
|
||||
mesh moved to its own bus on 2026-09-28 nothing can reach it at all. The claim is recorded as
|
||||
[`04-ISSUES/006`](04-ISSUES/006-hq-is-not-indexed-into-the-knowledge-base/00-report.md) and answered
|
||||
by [ADR 0025](02-DECISIONS/0025-the-design-record-is-read-not-copied.md): these documents are
|
||||
**read, not copied** — an agent reads this repository and a search consults it — and that agent is
|
||||
not built. So today this repository is reachable by whoever knows to open it and surfaces to nobody
|
||||
else. Said here rather than quietly reworded, because a claim that held up a decision and was never
|
||||
checked is precisely the failure this repository exists to name.
|
||||
|
||||
Answered separately, a repository of its own is the better home:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user