The numbering is the flow: decisions are 02, design is 03
papa-hq reads 01 research -> 03 decision -> 02 design. The order is a scar, not a choice: 02-DESIGN existed from its initial commit, and when adr/ was finally promoted on 2026-07-13 it took the next free number rather than its place in the sequence. By then design was too settled to renumber. hal-hq was three commits old, so it is not. adr/ becomes 02-DECISIONS and 02-DESIGN becomes 03-DESIGN, and following the folder numbers now walks the process in the order it happens: research produces a decision, the decision authorises a design. 00-GENESIS becomes 00-META, matching papa's rename from the same restructure. Every path reference rewritten across documents, frontmatter, playbooks and skills. All links resolve; all 58 frontmatter blocks parse and their path fields still point at files that exist.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ description: Use when investigating an open hal-hq issue — finding which compo
|
||||
# hal-diagnose
|
||||
|
||||
Investigates an open issue to the point where its owner is known. **Authoritative playbook:**
|
||||
[`00-GENESIS/process/03-issues.md`](../../../00-GENESIS/process/03-issues.md).
|
||||
[`00-META/process/03-issues.md`](../../../00-META/process/03-issues.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Before forming a hypothesis
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ result is not "nothing to learn" — it is the reason the next person repeats th
|
||||
what was ruled out and how. Archaeology — which commit, which pull request, which date a
|
||||
behaviour changed — is the most valuable content here.
|
||||
3. When the owner is known, set `status: located` and fill `located-in:` with repositories or
|
||||
modules from [`00-GENESIS/repos.md`](../../../00-GENESIS/repos.md).
|
||||
modules from [`00-META/repos.md`](../../../00-META/repos.md).
|
||||
4. On resolution: `status: resolved`, fill `fixed-by:`. If the root cause was a design gap, run
|
||||
`hal-graduate` for the amendment and fill `amended-design:`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user