Issue 092: genesis publishes to a registry the container runtime does not yet trust
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
status: open
|
||||||
|
opened: 2026-09-22
|
||||||
|
located-in: []
|
||||||
|
fixed-by:
|
||||||
|
amended-design:
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 092 — Genesis publishes to a registry the container runtime does not yet trust
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What was observed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On the first real genesis, on a machine in use, 2026-09-22.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Genesis raises the mesh's registry, then pushes the control plane's image into it so that the
|
||||||
|
control plane can be reinstalled as an ordinary module pinned to a digest. The push failed:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
the container runtime would not push <address>/mesh-controller:genesis:
|
||||||
|
Get "https://<address>/v2/": http: server gave HTTP response to HTTPS client
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The mesh's registry speaks plain HTTP, deliberately: every path to it is inside the private
|
||||||
|
network's encryption ([ADR 0082](../../02-DECISIONS/0082-the-registry-is-reached-by-name-and-trusted-by-the-overlay.md)).
|
||||||
|
The container runtime refuses plain HTTP to a registry it has not been told to trust, and **the
|
||||||
|
thing that tells it is the networking module**, which genesis installs at step 16 — six steps
|
||||||
|
after the push.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So genesis cannot complete on a machine whose runtime was not already told, out of band, to trust
|
||||||
|
the address the mesh is about to serve its own images from.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The lab never sees it: its base image writes that trust into the runtime's configuration before
|
||||||
|
any bed starts. That is the same blind spot [issue 084](../084-taking-networking-on-an-adopted-node-restarts-every-container/00-report.md)
|
||||||
|
names from the other side.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worked around by hand on the machine: the mesh's registry added to the runtime's trusted list,
|
||||||
|
keeping every key already there, and the runtime **reloaded** rather than restarted, so nothing it
|
||||||
|
was running stopped ([ADR 0102](../../02-DECISIONS/0102-the-mesh-writes-into-a-shared-file-never-over-it.md)).
|
||||||
|
Genesis then continued.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why it matters beyond this instance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Genesis is meant to take a machine from nothing to a mesh without anyone editing files on it. It
|
||||||
|
has one step that cannot work unless somebody already did. Every future first node meets this, not
|
||||||
|
only a node adopted beside a predecessor, and the order is what makes it so: the trust the push
|
||||||
|
needs is installed after the push.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It also breaks the rule that each step says what it needs before it changes anything. Preflight
|
||||||
|
checks that the bundle's registries are reachable. It does not check that the runtime will speak
|
||||||
|
to the one the mesh is about to raise.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Open questions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Should genesis write the runtime's trust itself, before the publish step, the way it writes
|
||||||
|
everything else the foundation needs — and hand it to the networking module afterwards?
|
||||||
|
- Or should the push not need it: a registry served over TLS from the start, or an image loaded
|
||||||
|
rather than pushed?
|
||||||
|
- Should preflight refuse a genesis whose runtime does not trust the registry it is being given,
|
||||||
|
rather than letting it fail at step 10?
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user