Issue 140 is resolved, and was resolved before it was read again
Written 2026-09-28, answered the same week by mesh-controller bdf965d and c68d3a7, and never closed — so the mesh's own account said reach was declared nowhere while three readers were reading it: the filter, the proxy's names, and each authority's host policy. The resolution names them and what checks each. What is left is retiring the older per-port keys the block replaces, which is not a gap in what reach can say.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
status: located
|
||||
status: resolved
|
||||
opened: 2026-09-28
|
||||
located-in:
|
||||
- mesh-controller internal/catalogue/manifest.go
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ located-in:
|
||||
- mesh-controller internal/catalogue/declaration.go
|
||||
- mesh-controller examples/route-proxy
|
||||
- mesh-catalog (every routed module manifest)
|
||||
fixed-by:
|
||||
fixed-by: mesh-controller bdf965d (a module names its endpoints) and c68d3a7 (an assignment configures an endpoint as one thing) — the filter, the proxy's names and both authorities now read one statement
|
||||
amended-design: 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user