Issue 140 is resolved, and was resolved before it was read again

Written 2026-09-28, answered the same week by mesh-controller bdf965d and
c68d3a7, and never closed — so the mesh's own account said reach was declared
nowhere while three readers were reading it: the filter, the proxy's names, and
each authority's host policy. The resolution names them and what checks each.

What is left is retiring the older per-port keys the block replaces, which is
not a gap in what reach can say.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-29 22:19:24 +02:00
parent 3c0f7082e6
commit ec8676c225
2 changed files with 49 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
status: located
status: resolved
opened: 2026-09-28
located-in:
- mesh-controller internal/catalogue/manifest.go
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ located-in:
- mesh-controller internal/catalogue/declaration.go
- mesh-controller examples/route-proxy
- mesh-catalog (every routed module manifest)
fixed-by:
fixed-by: mesh-controller bdf965d (a module names its endpoints) and c68d3a7 (an assignment configures an endpoint as one thing) — the filter, the proxy's names and both authorities now read one statement
amended-design: 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/08-connectivity.md
---