4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jochen	daa9f171ae	Issue reports carry only opened: the tracker holds every status, so no copy can drift ... The import of slice 3 (ADR 0275) was checked against every folder: no report changed since the commit it read, and the tracker holds each report's status, owner, fix, design amendment, replay and closing day. The keys are removed from all 361 reports, cycle.py refuses them in any report, and the playbooks, skills and READMEs that still pointed at them name the tracker instead.	2026-10-10 17:44:18 +02:00
jochen	6d1310f1ea	An issue's status lives in the issue tracker: playbook 03, cycle.py and the notes slice 3 of ADR 0275 asked for	2026-10-10 15:54:32 +02:00
jschoubben	47909c6b71	The records pointed at branches that no longer exist, and two fixes had no sequel ... Three issues named the branch that fixed them, and a branch is deleted when it merges — so every `fixed-by:` was a pointer that resolved to nothing by the time anyone followed it. They name commits and pull requests now, and playbook 03 says to. Two records were missing the thing a reader arrives for. 146 did not say that one of its fixes crash-looped the control plane on a running mesh, which is the whole reason the delivery subject carries the stream and the raise path was the only one exercised. 151 did not say that 152 removed the false reasons its roster moved, or that it stays open for the real ones. ADR 0080 enumerates what cycle.py enforces and named four things; it enforces five. A progressive insight names the fifth — the decision stands, the list had gone stale. The checks README and playbook 03 gained the same rule, and 155 points at all three.	2026-09-30 00:28:35 +02:00
jschoubben	becae7ba51	ADR 0080: the development cycle is checked, not trusted ... The flow the process overview draws — idea/symptom -> decision -> to-be design -> code -> as-is — was enforced by nothing. cycle.py now refuses a to-be design naming no decision, an in-progress/implemented design naming no owning code, a located/fixed issue with no owner, a fixed/resolved issue with no fix, and a graduated research overview that does not say what it became. AGENTS.md carries the cycle and a where-to-look table so a fresh session (or a cleared context) finds the chain in frontmatter instead of assuming it. Grounding the check surfaced two real gaps, fixed here: the work-ahead design named no owning code, and research 003 listed one became target twice. https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx	2026-09-17 22:28:03 +02:00