Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 418261213c Remove the decision records and research efforts, which the knowledge base now holds whole (issue 426)
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: THE CHANGE ALTERS ITS OWN CHECK (merge-check.sh): main's version judged it; the change's judges the pull requests after it merges; it…
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
ADR 0290 rule 9: once the import is checked record by record, hq keeps no copy.
The records and efforts are removed; every link or path to them reads "ADR NNNN" or
"research NNN"; a design's decisions: lists "ADR NNNN". 02-DECISIONS keeps a pointer
README with the reading order's six topics, which the knowledge base reads through the
records module; 01-RESEARCH keeps a pointer README. The checks drop the rules that
judged records (the knowledge base holds each at propose; checks/README.md says where)
and refuse a record written here again. Playbooks 01 and 02 and the skills write and
read records with the knowledge base's verbs.
2026-10-11 12:56:09 +02:00
jochen daa9f171ae Issue reports carry only opened: the tracker holds every status, so no copy can drift
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery delivered
The import of slice 3 (ADR 0275) was checked against every folder: no report changed since the
commit it read, and the tracker holds each report's status, owner, fix, design amendment, replay
and closing day. The keys are removed from all 361 reports, cycle.py refuses them in any report,
and the playbooks, skills and READMEs that still pointed at them name the tracker instead.
2026-10-10 17:44:18 +02:00
jschoubben 94fee5d849 Fix what the records review found
The glossary's authority page still named the controller's seat the-controller in two
entries, contradicting its own seat section after ADR 0079; issue 058's heading kept the
pre-renumber 059; 055's fixed-by named branches that stop existing after merge (now merge
commits/PRs) and its located-in listed file paths where the convention wants repos; 056's
located-in named mesh-host, which received no fix, instead of mesh-catalog; and the design
layer never said the one-store/one-broker property is enforced — 07-the-foundation and the
installation table now state the seats.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 22:24:57 +02:00
jschoubben ee7abe0a8e ADR 0079: foundation seats are named after their servers; issue 056 resolved
The store and broker were "one per mesh" by convention only. Each foundation module now
claims a mesh-scoped seat named after the server it guards — postgres/mesh-store,
lavinmq/mesh-broker — and the controller's seat is renamed the-controller -> mesh-controller
so all three follow one rule. The resolver refuses a second holder, closing 056. Glossary,
the foundation and installation docs, and the decisions index follow the new name.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 02:15:08 +02:00
jschoubben bec1dd0082 Issue 056 — an adopted module assigned to a second node raises a second server
"One postgres, one lavinmq" (ADR 0078) holds only by genesis assigning the
adopted modules to the control-node alone; nothing enforces it. A second assign
raises a divergent second server, silently. Open questions: a mesh-scoped
exclusive seat, or explicit adoption the controller refuses to place elsewhere.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 00:22:18 +02:00