Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 418261213c Remove the decision records and research efforts, which the knowledge base now holds whole (issue 426)
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: THE CHANGE ALTERS ITS OWN CHECK (merge-check.sh): main's version judged it; the change's judges the pull requests after it merges; it…
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
ADR 0290 rule 9: once the import is checked record by record, hq keeps no copy.
The records and efforts are removed; every link or path to them reads "ADR NNNN" or
"research NNN"; a design's decisions: lists "ADR NNNN". 02-DECISIONS keeps a pointer
README with the reading order's six topics, which the knowledge base reads through the
records module; 01-RESEARCH keeps a pointer README. The checks drop the rules that
judged records (the knowledge base holds each at propose; checks/README.md says where)
and refuse a record written here again. Playbooks 01 and 02 and the skills write and
read records with the knowledge base's verbs.
2026-10-11 12:56:09 +02:00
jochen daa9f171ae Issue reports carry only opened: the tracker holds every status, so no copy can drift
mesh/merge-gate pass: the change touches no module of the mesh's graph
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed
mesh/delivery delivered
The import of slice 3 (ADR 0275) was checked against every folder: no report changed since the
commit it read, and the tracker holds each report's status, owner, fix, design amendment, replay
and closing day. The keys are removed from all 361 reports, cycle.py refuses them in any report,
and the playbooks, skills and READMEs that still pointed at them name the tracker instead.
2026-10-10 17:44:18 +02:00
jschoubben ec8676c225 Issue 140 is resolved, and was resolved before it was read again
Written 2026-09-28, answered the same week by mesh-controller bdf965d and
c68d3a7, and never closed — so the mesh's own account said reach was declared
nowhere while three readers were reading it: the filter, the proxy's names, and
each authority's host policy. The resolution names them and what checks each.

What is left is retiring the older per-port keys the block replaces, which is
not a gap in what reach can say.
2026-09-29 22:19:24 +02:00
jschoubben 14ff89fa40 ADRs 0138 and 0139: an assignment binds an endpoint and says how far it reaches, and a network is forwarded because a module declared it
Both follow from the same rule the mesh is built on — a node's configuration is
composed from the modules assigned to it. Reach was settled separately by the
filter, the proxy's names and the certificate authority, so "this must not be
public" could not be written; it becomes one value on the assignment that all
three read. And the forward chain consulted two constants plus a typed list
although modules already declare their networks; it now forwards what they
declared, with the host rendering the addresses it allocated.
2026-09-28 23:03:32 +02:00
jschoubben dcdfcf104e Issues 140 and 141: an endpoint's reach is declared nowhere, and the forward chain follows constants instead of the modules
Found preparing the control-node's convergence. Reach is settled independently by
the filter, the proxy's names and the certificate authority, so "this must not be
public" cannot be written and a public certificate is obtained regardless. And the
forward chain allows two hardcoded ranges plus a typed list, though the mesh
already knows which networks exist because its own modules declared them — a range
wide enough to keep four of them would have forwarded two predecessor leftovers too.
2026-09-28 22:57:38 +02:00