Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jschoubben 94fee5d849 Fix what the records review found
The glossary's authority page still named the controller's seat the-controller in two
entries, contradicting its own seat section after ADR 0079; issue 058's heading kept the
pre-renumber 059; 055's fixed-by named branches that stop existing after merge (now merge
commits/PRs) and its located-in listed file paths where the convention wants repos; 056's
located-in named mesh-host, which received no fix, instead of mesh-catalog; and the design
layer never said the one-store/one-broker property is enforced — 07-the-foundation and the
installation table now state the seats.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 22:24:57 +02:00
jschoubben ee7abe0a8e ADR 0079: foundation seats are named after their servers; issue 056 resolved
The store and broker were "one per mesh" by convention only. Each foundation module now
claims a mesh-scoped seat named after the server it guards — postgres/mesh-store,
lavinmq/mesh-broker — and the controller's seat is renamed the-controller -> mesh-controller
so all three follow one rule. The resolver refuses a second holder, closing 056. Glossary,
the foundation and installation docs, and the decisions index follow the new name.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 02:15:08 +02:00
jschoubben bec1dd0082 Issue 056 — an adopted module assigned to a second node raises a second server
"One postgres, one lavinmq" (ADR 0078) holds only by genesis assigning the
adopted modules to the control-node alone; nothing enforces it. A second assign
raises a divergent second server, silently. Open questions: a mesh-scoped
exclusive seat, or explicit adoption the controller refuses to place elsewhere.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
2026-09-17 00:22:18 +02:00