Issue 117: a module's own code is a container in one record and a process in another #110
+14
-1
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ fixed-by:
|
||||
amended-design:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# 113 — Should the controller run as a container, or as a process the host supervises directly?
|
||||
# 114 — Should the controller run as a container, or as a process the host supervises directly?
|
||||
|
||||
## What was observed
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -71,3 +71,16 @@ checked.
|
||||
a controller outage tolerable regardless of which resource type it is?
|
||||
- If the answer is "keep it a container," what does that answer, precisely, that this issue asked —
|
||||
so the next person who notices the same asymmetry finds it answered rather than open again?
|
||||
|
||||
## The general case
|
||||
|
||||
[Issue 117](../117-a-modules-own-code-is-a-container-and-a-process/00-report.md) is the same
|
||||
question asked of every module rather than of the controller: a module's own code is a `container`
|
||||
in [ADR 0047](../../02-DECISIONS/0047-a-module-runs-its-code-as-its-own-process-with-its-own-account.md)
|
||||
and a `process` in the to-be design, and no record moves it. Its
|
||||
[diagnosis](../117-a-modules-own-code-is-a-container-and-a-process/01-diagnosis.md) answers the
|
||||
first open question above: the host's `process` shape is built, applied and tested, including the
|
||||
restart and run-to-completion semantics — so this would not need host-side work first.
|
||||
|
||||
The two do not collapse into one. The controller is not a code-carrying sidecar, and `network: host`
|
||||
is what makes the asymmetry visible here and nowhere else.
|
||||
@@ -150,12 +150,20 @@ controller is declared a `container` with `network: host` — so container netwo
|
||||
property that resource type usually buys, is not in use — and it asks what `type: container` buys
|
||||
that `type: process` would not.
|
||||
|
||||
It is unmerged and numbered 113, which is taken. A sibling branch,
|
||||
`issue/113-record-the-repin-and-fold-114`, is why `114` is free.
|
||||
It was unmerged and numbered 113, which is taken. A sibling branch,
|
||||
`issue/113-record-the-repin-and-fold-114`, is why `114` was free.
|
||||
|
||||
**That report and this one are the instance and the general condition**, and they do not conflict:
|
||||
it asks about one module that is not a code-carrying sidecar at all, and reaches the same question
|
||||
from the opposite end.
|
||||
from the opposite end. So it lands in this change as
|
||||
[issue 114](../114-should-the-controller-be-a-container-or-a-process/00-report.md), its commit and
|
||||
authorship intact, with a section pointing here — rather than being folded in and losing the
|
||||
`network: host` observation, which is its own and is not reproduced above.
|
||||
|
||||
This diagnosis answers its first open question. The host's `process` shape does support what
|
||||
[ADR 0005](../../02-DECISIONS/0005-the-node-host.md) describes for the host's own launcher — the
|
||||
unit, the timer, restart, and run-to-completion gating are implemented and tested — so that report
|
||||
does not need host-side work before it can be decided.
|
||||
|
||||
## What is located, and what is not
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user