01-RESEARCH/020-what-a-bundled-tool-is-given/00-overview.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+---
+status: active
+initiated: 2026-10-03
+touches: [the tool runtime, the catalogue's tool bundles, the controller's declaration composer, settings, own secrets, 03-DESIGN/01-to-be/38-building-the-operators-machine.md]
+became: []
+---
+
+# 020 — What a bundled tool is given
+
+## What is being investigated
+
+How a module's tools, once they are a bundle the node's runtime loads
+([ADR 0175](../../02-DECISIONS/0175-one-tool-runtime-per-node-serves-every-modules-tools-on-the-host-side.md),
+[ADR 0188](../../02-DECISIONS/0188-a-modules-own-code-is-bundles-in-any-language-and-a-tools-bundle-speaks-mcp-to-the-runtime.md)),
+learn the things their container used to be handed: where the module's configuration file is, where
+its token or password is, which port the service listens on, where a provision's address is written.
+A container is given these as an environment and mounts, composed by the mesh per module per machine.
+A bundle has no environment of its own: the runtime's process carries four words for every bundle it
+loads, and nothing per module ([design 38](../../03-DESIGN/01-to-be/38-building-the-operators-machine.md) WP4).
+
+## Why
+
+Two holders moved on 2026-10-03 — the packet filter and the intrusion prevention — and both could,
+because neither needs anything but a fixed path and root. Of the thirty-three modules whose tools
+still run as containers on the runtime's image, thirty-one are not like that: their environment
+names a configuration file, a credential file, a service address, a grants directory. Moving them
+one by one without a rule for this would give the mesh thirty-one answers to one question. The
+measurement and the options are in [01](01-what-the-containers-are-given.md).
+
+## What it touches
+
+The runtime (which hands a bundle what it is given), the composer (which resolves `${dir:…}` and
+`${port:…}` for a container today and would for a bundle), the manifest (where a bundle would say
+what it needs), and design 38, which records the gap and must say the rule once there is one.

01-RESEARCH/020-what-a-bundled-tool-is-given/01-what-the-containers-are-given.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# What the tool containers are given, measured
+
+Counted 2026-10-03 in the catalogue, after the two holders moved.
+
+| | |
+|---|---|
+| modules whose tools still run as a container on the runtime's image | 33 |
+| tool containers among them (two modules run two) | 36 |
+| modules whose container's environment carries only the bus credential | 1 (the intrusion prevention, now moved) |
+| modules whose container's environment carries more | 32 — 31 still containers |
+
+## What "more" is
+
+Every value a container is given is one of five shapes. The reference kinds the composer resolves
+in those values, over the 36 containers: a module directory (`${dir:…}`) in all 36, a mesh-chosen
+port (`${port:…}`) in 12, a seat and an access grant once each.
+
+1. **A file the mesh already places on the host, mounted in.** The module's configuration as
+   JSON (`…_CONFIG_FILE`), its own secret (`…_TOKEN_FILE`, `…_PASSWORD_FILE`, `MESH_BROKER_FILE`),
+   a provision's address and secret written for it. Every one is a path under one of the module's
+   directories — its mesh state, its state, its grants, what it has written — mounted at a path of
+   the container's choosing and named to the tool through the environment. **The file is on the
+   host already; only the name under which the tool finds it is the container's.**
+2. **The service's address, with the port the mesh chose:** `http://127.0.0.1:${port:3000}`. The
+   port is the composer's; the rest is the manifest's constant.
+3. **A provision's address as a constant string** (a database's URL on the module's own network
+   name), paired with a mounted secret file from shape 1.
+4. **A directory of grants** (`MESH_RECEIVES`): shape 1 again, a directory rather than a file.
+5. **Literals the image needs:** a time zone, a user id, a memory limit. These belong to the
+   service's container where one exists; a tool bundle needs none of them.
+
+So the whole of what a bundled tool needs is: the paths of its module's directories on this
+machine, the ports the mesh chose for its module here, and the constants its own manifest wrote.
+Nothing a container had that a bundle cannot have; the mesh composes all three for the container
+today, per module per machine.
+
+## What the runtime already has for it
+
+- The SDK's tool contributor is `(env) => tools`, and `collectTools(env)` takes the environment to
+  hand each contributor. The runtime calls it without one, so every contributor reads the process's
+  — the four words. The hook for a per-module environment exists and is unused.
+- A launched bundle ([ADR 0188](../../02-DECISIONS/0188-a-modules-own-code-is-bundles-in-any-language-and-a-tools-bundle-speaks-mcp-to-the-runtime.md))
+  is spawned with the runtime's environment; the launch takes an environment argument.
+- The composer resolves `${dir:…}` and `${port:…}` for a container's `env` and `volumes`; the same
+  resolution over a bundle's declaration is the same code.
+
+## Options
+
+**A. The bundle declares its environment on its artifact, and the mesh composes it as a
+container's.** The manifest's tools artifact gains `env`, resolved with the same references;
+values that were mount targets become the host-side paths directly (`${dir:mesh-state}/config.json`
+rather than `/run/config/config.json`). The controller composes one environment per bundle per
+machine into the runtime's declaration; the runtime hands it to the bundle's contributor and to a
+launched child, and to nothing else. *For:* the tool code does not change — it reads the same
+names; the conversion of the thirty-one is a mechanical move of the container's `env` with the
+mounts folded in; one rule, one place. *Against:* the runtime's process carries thirty-one
+environments in its declaration, and a bundle's environment is visible to the other bundles in the
+process unless the runtime keeps them apart, which it must — a tool that reads `process.env`
+instead of the environment it was handed would see its neighbours' paths.
+
+**B. The runtime derives the environment from the module's placed manifest.** No new field: the
+runtime reads, for each module it serves, where that module's directories and ports are, and hands
+a conventional set of words. *For:* nothing to declare. *Against:* a convention the tool code must
+be rewritten to, thirty-one times; the runtime learns the composer's job; a module that names its
+file `config.json` and one that names it `settings.json` need different words anyway.
+
+**C. Tools read their module's files through the bus** — ask the controller. *Against:* a tool
+that cannot start without the bus answering a question is a tool that fails in the one case the
+tools exist for, and a secret crossing the bus to reach a file already on the machine is a
+disclosure for nothing.
+
+A is the one that keeps the tool code and the composer's vocabulary as they are, and names the one
+thing the runtime must add: an environment per bundle, kept apart. The thing to decide beside it:
+whether a bundle's environment may name a secret file at all, or whether secrets stay mounts in
+spirit — a path the tool reads, never a value in the environment — which is what every container
+does today and what A keeps if the rule says *paths, not values*.
+
+## What a decision would have to say
+
+- Where a bundle says what it is given (the artifact, option A), and that values are paths and
+  constants, never a secret's content.
+- That the composer resolves it with the references it already has, per module per machine.
+- That the runtime hands each bundle its own environment and nothing of another's, and how that is
+  checked: a test loading two bundles whose environments differ and asserting each sees only its own.
+- That the thirty-one move in one mechanical change after the rule lands, each proven by its tools
+  answering from the runtime, and the registration gate then refuses the container shape for all.

03-DESIGN/01-to-be/38-building-the-operators-machine.md

@@ -215,7 +215,15 @@ file and answers with the table, `remove` refuses the mesh's own table by name
 `mesh-nftables` on any, the container's credential is gone with it, and `status` is well. One thing
 the step found is issue
 [210](../../04-ISSUES/210-the-host-re-creates-the-nodes-runtime-on-every-reconcile/00-report.md):
-the host re-creates the runtime's process on every reconcile.
+the host re-creates the runtime's process on every reconcile (resolved the same day, mesh-host #80).
+*fail2ban followed 2026-10-03* (mesh-catalog `aa5bf7d`), the same shape: container, base images,
+credential and state directory gone, the client through `sudo` since the daemon's socket is root's;
+proven on all four machines — `status`, `banned` and the module's own `fail2ban_settings` answer from
+the runtime, no `mesh-fail2ban` container, the runtime serving both bundles. Two holders moved; of the
+thirty-three tool containers the catalogue held, thirty-one remain, and all but these two carried their
+module's configuration and secrets in the container's environment, which a bundle does not have — the
+question research [020](../../01-RESEARCH/020-what-a-bundled-tool-is-given/00-overview.md) opens
+before the rest move.
 
 ## WP5 — The shell, on a server first