ADR 0098; issue 076 opened and resolved; ADR 0097's base refusal live; ADR 0096 proven against the public hub; 074 down to one bed #69
@@ -9,3 +9,17 @@
|
||||
|
||||
**Located in:** the two manifests. Decided in
|
||||
[ADR 0098](../../02-DECISIONS/0098-a-fact-a-provider-makes-at-first-start-is-fetched-from-it.md).
|
||||
|
||||
**Proven** the same day: the route-forwarding bed raises the authority, the proxy and a consumer
|
||||
from the catalogue on one node and serves a public name through the proxy. Two things the run
|
||||
taught, both about the bed rather than the decision:
|
||||
|
||||
- The authority certifies itself for the machine's private-network address, which is what a
|
||||
consumer on any node dials. A machine raised from the foundation bundle has no such address
|
||||
until it is placed on the overlay, so a bed must place it first — as a hub of one, the way a
|
||||
real first node is.
|
||||
- With the overlay's networking and the three modules in **one** push, the proxy's fetch of the
|
||||
roots timed out at the private-network address; with the overlay converged first and the
|
||||
modules pushed after, it passes. Whether that was the order of application within a push or
|
||||
the filter closing the interface until it was derived was not isolated. A consumer whose first
|
||||
start dials a provider assumes the provider's network is already there; the bed makes it so.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user