--- topic: what runs on it status: accepted date: 2026-09-21 deciders: jochen reconstructed: false extends: 02-DECISIONS/0010-delivery.md --- # 87. A seeded file is created once, and what grows in it is not the mesh's ## Context A declaration is complete for what the host owns, and the host reconciles what is declared ([ADR 0010](0010-delivery.md)): a file with this content, held to it. That is the only thing a manifest could say about a file, and it is the wrong thing for a file a module needs to **exist before first start** and something else then legitimately writes into — an access list a provisioner appends consumers to and the program persists back, a bootstrap configuration a program rewrites. Every reconcile restored the seed behind the running program, erased what had grown in it, and reported success ([issue 035](../04-ISSUES/035-reconciling-a-seed-file-wipes-what-grew-in-it/00-report.md)). A run-once step ([ADR 0052](0052-a-step-that-runs-once-before-a-container.md)) can write a seed only if absent, and that closed the instance for a broker whose seed is a program's job. It left the general case: a plain file the mesh writes and never overwrites. ## Considered Options 1. **Two owners never share a file: the provisioner owns it, and first-start ordering is solved another way.** Rejected as the only answer — some software refuses to start without the file, and a module that must ship a program merely to write an empty file has been made to write a program to say one word. 2. **A create-once semantic on a file.** Adopted. ## Decision A file resource may say `create-once`. The host writes it when it is absent and, when it is present, leaves it entirely alone — content, mode and owner — and reports it as **kept**, not corrected. What is in the file then is somebody else's work the mesh asked for. The mesh removes nothing it did not create ([ADR 0030](0030-data-outlives-the-mesh-that-declared-it.md)); it now also does not overwrite what it created once and handed over. On the security question ADR 0010 asks of every new resource behaviour: this **narrows** what a declaration can do to a machine. A create-once file gives a compromised control plane one fewer way to change a machine repeatedly — it can seed, once, and never again. ## Consequences A module says which of its files are seeds, and the difference is visible in the manifest rather than in whether the file happened to be revisited. A later change to a seed's declared content does not reach a machine that already has the file; that is the meaning of a seed, and a module that needs the new content ships it as a run-once step that migrates the existing file. ## How it is checked The host's apply tests: a seed is created, grown into by hand, reconciled, and the growth survives with the outcome `kept`. The vault bed declares one on a real node, grows it, pushes again, and reads it back. ## References - [issue 035](../04-ISSUES/035-reconciling-a-seed-file-wipes-what-grew-in-it/00-report.md) - [ADR 0010](0010-delivery.md), [ADR 0030](0030-data-outlives-the-mesh-that-declared-it.md), [ADR 0052](0052-a-step-that-runs-once-before-a-container.md)