# What the tool containers are given, measured Counted 2026-10-03 in the catalogue, after the two holders moved. | | | |---|---| | modules whose tools still run as a container on the runtime's image | 33 | | tool containers among them (two modules run two) | 36 | | modules whose container's environment carries only the bus credential | 1 (the intrusion prevention, now moved) | | modules whose container's environment carries more | 32 — 31 still containers | ## What "more" is Every value a container is given is one of five shapes. The reference kinds the composer resolves in those values, over the 36 containers: a module directory (`${dir:…}`) in all 36, a mesh-chosen port (`${port:…}`) in 12, a seat and an access grant once each. 1. **A file the mesh already places on the host, mounted in.** The module's configuration as JSON (`…_CONFIG_FILE`), its own secret (`…_TOKEN_FILE`, `…_PASSWORD_FILE`, `MESH_BROKER_FILE`), a provision's address and secret written for it. Every one is a path under one of the module's directories — its mesh state, its state, its grants, what it has written — mounted at a path of the container's choosing and named to the tool through the environment. **The file is on the host already; only the name under which the tool finds it is the container's.** 2. **The service's address, with the port the mesh chose:** `http://127.0.0.1:${port:3000}`. The port is the composer's; the rest is the manifest's constant. 3. **A provision's address as a constant string** (a database's URL on the module's own network name), paired with a mounted secret file from shape 1. 4. **A directory of grants** (`MESH_RECEIVES`): shape 1 again, a directory rather than a file. 5. **Literals the image needs:** a time zone, a user id, a memory limit. These belong to the service's container where one exists; a tool bundle needs none of them. So the whole of what a bundled tool needs is: the paths of its module's directories on this machine, the ports the mesh chose for its module here, and the constants its own manifest wrote. Nothing a container had that a bundle cannot have; the mesh composes all three for the container today, per module per machine. ## What the runtime already has for it - The SDK's tool contributor is `(env) => tools`, and `collectTools(env)` takes the environment to hand each contributor. The runtime calls it without one, so every contributor reads the process's — the four words. The hook for a per-module environment exists and is unused. - A launched bundle ([ADR 0188](../../02-DECISIONS/0188-a-modules-own-code-is-bundles-in-any-language-and-a-tools-bundle-speaks-mcp-to-the-runtime.md)) is spawned with the runtime's environment; the launch takes an environment argument. - The composer resolves `${dir:…}` and `${port:…}` for a container's `env` and `volumes`; the same resolution over a bundle's declaration is the same code. ## Options **A. The bundle declares its environment on its artifact, and the mesh composes it as a container's.** The manifest's tools artifact gains `env`, resolved with the same references; values that were mount targets become the host-side paths directly (`${dir:mesh-state}/config.json` rather than `/run/config/config.json`). The controller composes one environment per bundle per machine into the runtime's declaration; the runtime hands it to the bundle's contributor and to a launched child, and to nothing else. *For:* the tool code does not change — it reads the same names; the conversion of the thirty-one is a mechanical move of the container's `env` with the mounts folded in; one rule, one place. *Against:* the runtime's process carries thirty-one environments in its declaration, and a bundle's environment is visible to the other bundles in the process unless the runtime keeps them apart, which it must — a tool that reads `process.env` instead of the environment it was handed would see its neighbours' paths. **B. The runtime derives the environment from the module's placed manifest.** No new field: the runtime reads, for each module it serves, where that module's directories and ports are, and hands a conventional set of words. *For:* nothing to declare. *Against:* a convention the tool code must be rewritten to, thirty-one times; the runtime learns the composer's job; a module that names its file `config.json` and one that names it `settings.json` need different words anyway. **C. Tools read their module's files through the bus** — ask the controller. *Against:* a tool that cannot start without the bus answering a question is a tool that fails in the one case the tools exist for, and a secret crossing the bus to reach a file already on the machine is a disclosure for nothing. A is the one that keeps the tool code and the composer's vocabulary as they are, and names the one thing the runtime must add: an environment per bundle, kept apart. The thing to decide beside it: whether a bundle's environment may name a secret file at all, or whether secrets stay mounts in spirit — a path the tool reads, never a value in the environment — which is what every container does today and what A keeps if the rule says *paths, not values*. ## What a decision would have to say - Where a bundle says what it is given (the artifact, option A), and that values are paths and constants, never a secret's content. - That the composer resolves it with the references it already has, per module per machine. - That the runtime hands each bundle its own environment and nothing of another's, and how that is checked: a test loading two bundles whose environments differ and asserting each sees only its own. - That the thirty-one move in one mechanical change after the rule lands, each proven by its tools answering from the runtime, and the registration gate then refuses the container shape for all.