Files
jschoubben 333356cff3 Order the records the way the system is learned
Jochen asked whether the order made sense. It did not -- it followed when
things happened to be decided, which after consolidation is fictional anyway
since record 5 alone folds decisions taken across a week.

Concretely wrong before: the domain statement sat at 8, after five engineering
rules; the constitution was scattered across 5, 12 and 17; the tiers landed at
15, 16, 21 and 22 with process records in between.

Now it walks: what the mesh is (1-3), its tiers from the bottom up (4-8), what
runs on them and how it gets there (9-10), how it is built (11-16), how it is
checked (17-18), how we work (19-23).

Two things made this safe rather than free. It is a permutation, not a
compaction, so the renames go through temporary names -- otherwise two files
want one slot and one is lost. And the reference rewrite is a single
simultaneous pass, because almost every number moved into a slot another number
was vacating; replacing one at a time would have cascaded and pointed things at
the wrong record while still resolving.

Verified: 284 [ADR NNNN](path) links across the repository, all with matching
text and target.

The ordering principle is now stated in 19 rather than left implicit -- the
repository already said "the numbering is the flow" about its folders, and
there was no reason for the records to be the exception.
2026-08-28 23:30:42 +02:00

3.3 KiB

status, initiated, touches, became
status initiated touches became
graduated 2026-08-22
03-DESIGN/00-as-is/01-mesh-and-transport.md
03-DESIGN/01-to-be/01-end-to-end-testing.md
02-DECISIONS/0016-the-lab.md
02-DECISIONS/0016-the-lab.md
02-DECISIONS/0016-the-lab.md
03-DESIGN/01-to-be/02-scenario-declaration.md
03-DESIGN/01-to-be/01-end-to-end-testing.md

004 — Reproducing the mesh network in a lab

  • Initiated by: jochen, 2026-08-22 — "the most difficult part of our VM setup will be the networking part"
  • Areas touched: modules/wireguard, modules/dnsmasq-app, modules/traefik, modules/mesh-ca, node_accessors, nodes.site / nodes.underlay_addr.

Summary

The network is entirely generated from mesh-DB rows by module hooks. install.d performs no network configuration whatsoever — no WireGuard, no DNS, no firewall. That makes a faithful lab primarily a data problem rather than a networking problem, and means the lab exercises the real code path instead of a reimplementation of it.

One constraint decides whether the lab works at all: the WireGuard endpoint rule tests the underlay address against an RFC1918 regex to decide reachability. A simulated public segment addressed from RFC1918 space silently prevents the mesh from forming — no endpoint is written for the hub, so nothing can ever initiate. The simulated public segment must therefore use TEST-NET-3 (203.0.113.0/24).

With that one substitution the lab reproduces the production topology exactly, including the case that is hardest to get right: a node that is publicly named but sits behind NAT, whose endpoint the hub can only learn from a handshake.

Detail in analysis.md.

Settled

The lab issues its own certificates. Public names are certified by an ACME server on the lab's wan segment; .internal names keep the mesh CA. The lab preserves production's two-CA split rather than collapsing it, because a single-CA lab would hide any bug living in that split. It also makes the router's port forward load-bearing — HTTP-01 must reach the published-but-NATed node on port 80, so a broken forward becomes a reproducible certificate failure instead of a mystery.

Requires one change: caServer is not set on the reverse proxy today, so it defaults to the public authority's production endpoint. It must become configurable, defaulting to production so real nodes are unaffected.

Open

Closed 2026-08-25. The lab is stood up. The topology this effort described raises, and the substitution it turned on — a simulated public segment addressed from documentation space rather than RFC1918 — is enforced by the declaration validator before anything is raised rather than left as a thing to remember.

The certificate conclusion above is carried by 01-end-to-end-testing.md, which specifies the lab's own ACME issuer on the public segment. It is designed and not built — implementation state is a third axis, and the effort graduates on its conclusions, not on their delivery.

One item leaves this effort without a home and is recorded here so it is not lost: the reverse proxy does not set caServer, so it defaults to the public authority's production endpoint. That is a fact about what runs today, not about the lab.