Files
hq/01-RESEARCH
jschoubben 00b8398d07 skeleton: hal-agent -> hal-host, and the two gaps the questions found
Agent is a first-class concept here — a participant, some of whom are
human, holding identity and memory. Using it for the tier-0 node binary
put both meanings in one document: hal-agent at tier 0, agents at tier 2.
That is the anatomy-naming failure again, an evocative domain word
pointing at infrastructure, and how-we-build 4 exists to catch it.

ADR 0015's own title supplies the fix: the mesh brokers, nodes host,
agents think. So the control plane brokers (hal-mesh), the tier-0 binary
hosts (hal-host), the participant thinks (agents, untouched). hal-node was
rejected — Node is the inventory aggregate, the binary is what runs on it.
Recorded in the document as a near-miss rather than quietly corrected.

Tiers now explained before the tree, as a boot narrative, with the point
they were carrying made explicit: dependencies point only downward, that
is the whole bootstrap answer, and the current mesh violates it — the
database is a module, modules come from the pipeline, the pipeline needs
the database.

Connectivity gains the part that was missing. Naming a context says who
decides, not who runs it: overlay membership is tier 0 in the host, policy
is tier 2, machinery is tier 4 modules. And the host's link to the control
plane deliberately does not run over the overlay, or the overlay would
have to exist before a node could be told how to join it.

'tier' is this document's coinage and did not land on first reading; that
is now an open question rather than settled vocabulary.
2026-08-23 20:32:20 +02:00
..

01-RESEARCH

Investigations that have not yet hardened into design.

Structure

Each effort lives in NNN-descriptive-name/ and must contain 00-overview.md, carrying its state in YAML frontmatter and a prose summary below it:

---
status: active | graduated | abandoned
initiated: YYYY-MM-DD
touches: []          # design docs, subsystems or areas the effort bears on
became: []           # required when status is terminal — what it turned into
---

The prose says what is being investigated, why, and what it touches. It does not restate the status — status lives in one place, and two places is one too many.

Further documents in the same folder hold the work itself: notes, evidence, option analyses, draft designs.

Lifecycle

status Meaning
active Investigation in progress.
graduated Checked against 00-META, decided in 02-DECISIONS/, and specified in 03-DESIGN — see became:.
abandoned Stopped or superseded. Nothing is deleted.

An effort graduates by producing a decision record and a 03-DESIGN entry. It is abandoned in place — never deleted. What was rejected, and why, is the more expensive half to rediscover.

Starting and closing efforts is playbook territory: 00-META/process/01-research.md and 02-graduation.md.

Rules

  • Markdown only. Do not skip or reuse a sequence number.
  • Evidence, not assertion. An effort that measured nothing has not finished.
  • Research describes real observations but never identifies the mesh it observed. The shape of a finding survives anonymisation intact.