jschoubben
10fa7c76d7
Third correction to one table today, found the same way as the other two: by asking whether both halves of the test were answered, or only the easy one. 0006 admits the registry because "it cannot grant itself a repository" — true, and the second half. Nothing established that the control plane needs one in order to run. Counted rather than argued: the bundle raises twelve resources and no registry is among them. The registry arrives afterwards as an ordinary module, which is exactly what the lab asserts. 0006 half-said this already, calling it "substrate by role and ordinary by delivery, provisioned once there is a control plane to do it". A member provisioned by the thing it supposedly precedes is not a member; that phrase was carrying a contradiction rather than resolving one. The registry is a closer call than the object store and the difference is worth keeping: the control plane never touches an object store at all, but it genuinely uses the registry. So the registry is a real dependency of the mesh operating and not of the control plane starting — and it is the second that the word means. The substrate is now exactly what the bundle raises, which is the strongest form the list can take: checkable by counting rather than by reading an argument, and the two cannot drift. The finding is not about substrates. A test with two conditions is a test only when both are asked.
03-DESIGN / 01-to-be
The mesh being built toward. Every statement here traces to a record in
02-DECISIONS/; nothing arrives by drafting.
A document here describes an intention. What currently runs is in
00-as-is/, and the two are never merged — when something ships, the as-is
document is written and this one's status becomes implemented.
| Document | Covers | Rests on |
|---|---|---|
00-work-breakdown.md |
How modules move across one at a time, until the old registry can be switched off | ADR 0001, ADR 0016 |
01-end-to-end-testing.md |
The lab: a real mesh a change can be run against before it reaches nodes | ADR 0016, 0029 |
02-scenario-declaration.md |
What a scenario declares — the underlay, and what to place on it | ADR 0016 |
03-scenario-lifecycle.md |
What happens to a scenario — raise, snapshot, restore, move, destroy | ADR 0016 |
04-lab-installation.md |
Getting the lab onto a clean machine, and why it verifies capability rather than installation | ADR 0010 |
05-the-node-host.md |
Tier 0 — the one thing installed by hand, and the only thing that changes a machine | ADR 0005 |
06-the-control-plane.md |
Tier 2 — what the term means, and the test for what belongs in it | ADR 0005 |
07-the-substrate.md |
Tier 1 — what the control plane consumes and cannot grant itself | ADR 0004, 0048 |
08-connectivity.md |
One context in full — overlay, resolution, exposure, filtering, certificates | ADR 0007, 0050, 0051, 0055 |
09-the-node-lifecycle.md |
How a machine becomes a node, stays one, and stops being one | ADR 0004, 0051 |
10-delivery.md |
Modules, the three edges, and how a change becomes a running thing | ADR 0010, 0064, 0065 |
11-a-board.md |
What a person sees of the mesh, and why it is read from what runs | ADR 0008, ADR 0001 |
12-a-module-repository.md |
A module repository, and what builds it | ADR 0009, ADR 0010, ADR 0005 |
13-credentials-and-their-rotation.md |
Credentials, and moving them without a consumer holding one the provider does not know about | ADR 0001, ADR 0009 |
14-model-access.md |
Model access as a provision, and what a licence is bound to | ADR 0024, ADR 0009 |
15-the-agent-session.md |
One mechanism started twice — a node's session and the mesh's | ADR 0004, ADR 0026 |
Not yet written
- The remaining six contexts.
ADR 0006
settles the list at seven;
connectivityis the first written in full (08) and the other six do not exist yet. The work breakdown says in what order they are needed. Domain grouping outside the core.Not needed. ADR 0009 is superseded by ADR 0009: there is no domain module to group into, so there is no domain list to settle. Relationships are edges, and grouping is a tag and a query.