Files
hq/03-DESIGN
jschoubben 39c802cbd4 Step 2: adoption recreates the bus once, on purpose
2.3 was already true and is now proved — the seat refusal is generic, and
three tests pin what matters: a second bus is refused by name, a different
bus implementation is refused too (which is what makes the bus replaceable),
and the AMQP broker no longer contends so both run on one mesh.

2.1/2.2 turned out not to be a no-op. The host keeps a container only when
its spec matches exactly; genesis raises the upstream image and the module
declares the mesh-built one carrying the entrypoint, so assigning it
recreates the container. That is ADR 0067's pivot and it is safe only
because the bus carries nothing yet — which is why step 2 comes before
anything speaks NATS. After it, never again: the config is a directory
mount, so accounts change without touching the container's spec.
2026-09-26 21:40:02 +02:00
..

03-DESIGN

The authoritative specification. Implementation is built against what is written here.

Two layers

Folder What it is
00-as-is/ The mesh that exists today. Shipped behaviour, described as it is — including behaviour nobody would choose again.
01-to-be/ The mesh being built toward. Every statement traceable to a record in 02-DECISIONS/.

They are never mixed. A statement about the future does not belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.

When a to-be design ships, it does not move. Its as-is counterpart is written or updated, the to-be document's status becomes implemented, and both stand — one describing what runs, the other recording what was intended. Deleting the intention loses the reasoning, which is the expensive half.

Frontmatter

Every design document (not the READMEs) carries:

---
layer: as-is | to-be
status: designed | in-progress | implemented | abandoned
code: []                 # owning code repo(s), from 00-META/repos.md
updated: YYYY-MM-DD      # date of the last status change, not of text edits
decisions: []            # 02-DECISIONS/ records this document rests on
---

For an as-is document, status: implemented is the normal state — it describes something that runs — and code: names where that implementation lives.

Status changes when implementation state changes, never because design text was edited. An implemented claim must be defensible from the owning repository's main branch, not from intent. If it cannot be checked, it is in-progress.

Cross-cutting views are generated from this frontmatter by the hq-status skill and never written to disk.

What belongs here

Functional analysis, architectural description, and specification — prose and diagrams only, no code. A manifest field may be named; a manifest may not be pasted. A document enters the to-be layer only after the decision behind it is recorded in 02-DECISIONS/ and the research that produced it is closed.

Subfolders are encouraged where a layer grows enough to need them.