Files
hq/03-DESIGN
jschoubben f65acb98c7
mesh/delivery merged: source.main moved to novox/hq@1c6fe9611ccc
mesh/check checking f65acb98c742 on 1c6fe9611ccc
Compose a bucket's binding from the bus module's existing list answer, breaking the registry circle
The bus module's new build cannot be built: its image needs the registry's
mirror, which the registry holder serves only with a state binding the grants
part never heard and waited for that very build to say. The operator chose
(2026-11-11 13:30 CET) to compose key-value and object-store bindings from the
fields the running bus module already answers, delivered with the grants part
alone. Records that §7's 'needs no edge' missed the bus module's own build
through the registry.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KEq4zoDfM9WtYpcQgZ
2026-11-11 13:48:10 +01:00
..

03-DESIGN

The authoritative specification. Implementation is built against what is written here.

Two layers

Folder What it is
00-as-is/ The mesh that exists today. Shipped behaviour, described as it is — including behaviour nobody would choose again.
01-to-be/ The mesh being built toward. Every statement traceable to a decision record in the knowledge base (ADR 0290).

They are never mixed. A statement about the future does not belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.

When a to-be design ships, it does not move. Its as-is counterpart is written or updated, the to-be document's status becomes implemented, and both stand — one describing what runs, the other recording what was intended. Deleting the intention loses the reasoning, which is the expensive half.

Frontmatter

Every design document (not the READMEs) carries:

---
layer: as-is | to-be
status: designed | in-progress | implemented | abandoned
code: []                 # owning code repo(s), from 00-META/repos.md
updated: YYYY-MM-DD      # date of the last status change, not of text edits
decisions: []            # the decision records this document rests on, each "ADR NNNN"
---

For an as-is document, status: implemented is the normal state — it describes something that runs — and code: names where that implementation lives.

Status changes when implementation state changes, never because design text was edited. An implemented claim must be defensible from the owning repository's main branch, not from intent. If it cannot be checked, it is in-progress.

Cross-cutting views are generated from this frontmatter by the hq-status skill and never written to disk.

What belongs here

Functional analysis, architectural description, and specification — prose and diagrams only, no code. A manifest field may be named; a manifest may not be pasted. A document enters the to-be layer only after the decision behind it is recorded in the knowledge base and the research that produced it is closed.

Subfolders are encouraged where a layer grows enough to need them.