jschoubben
6abfec7433
Fixes, each named where it was wrong: - reload-on is a service field; a container only has restart-on, which recreates. Cited precedent (registry-trust-reload) is a service resource, not a container. Fix: nats-server's own SIGHUP reload, triggered by an in-image entrypoint watching a directory-mounted config file (issue 103's recreate-on-change applies to a directly-mounted file, not a directory's contents) -- asks nothing new of the host. - A JetStream-delivered message's Reply field is already claimed by the consumer's own ack address, so a responder using it answers nobody. Fix: every CONTROL message needing a reply carries its reply subject in its own payload; the controller publishes there explicitly, never via Respond(). Enrolment is the case this design actually depends on, so it's fixed there too, not just noted. - The listed permissions never granted publish on a durable consumer's own ack-reply subject -- a module could receive but never ack, so every message redelivers forever. Fixed with a scoped grant per module's own consumer. - One account (a deliberate choice, kept) means inbox privacy is the permission list or nothing. The design granted 'its reply inbox' without scoping it, which read as any user reaching any inbox. Fixed: each user's inbox prefix is derived from its own identity and its permissions name only that prefix. New open question from this revision, not closed: whether the in-image watch-and-SIGHUP shape belongs in mesh-sdk if a second module ever needs it. Checks pass (records.py, cycle.py, index.py).
03-DESIGN / 01-to-be
The mesh being built toward. Every statement here traces to a record in
02-DECISIONS/; nothing arrives by drafting.
A document here describes an intention. What currently runs is in
00-as-is/, and the two are never merged — when something ships, the as-is
document is written and this one's status becomes implemented.
| Document | Covers | Rests on |
|---|---|---|
00-work-breakdown.md |
How modules move across one at a time, until the old registry can be switched off | ADR 0001, ADR 0016 |
01-end-to-end-testing.md |
The lab: a real mesh a change can be run against before it reaches nodes | ADR 0016, 0029 |
02-scenario-declaration.md |
What a scenario declares — the underlay, and what to place on it | ADR 0016 |
03-scenario-lifecycle.md |
What happens to a scenario — raise, snapshot, restore, move, destroy | ADR 0016 |
04-lab-installation.md |
Getting the lab onto a clean machine, and why it verifies capability rather than installation | ADR 0010 |
05-the-node-host.md |
Tier 0 — the one thing installed by hand, and the only thing that changes a machine | ADR 0005 |
06-the-controller.md |
Tier 2 — what the term means, and the test for what belongs in it | ADR 0005 |
07-the-foundation.md |
Tier 1 — what the controller consumes and cannot grant itself | ADR 0004, 0048 |
08-connectivity.md |
One context in full — overlay, resolution, exposure, filtering, certificates | ADR 0007, 0050, 0051, 0055 |
09-the-node-lifecycle.md |
How a machine becomes a node, stays one, and stops being one | ADR 0004, 0051 |
10-delivery.md |
Modules, the three edges, and how a change becomes a running thing | ADR 0010, 0064, 0065 |
11-a-board.md |
What a person sees of the mesh, and why it is read from what runs | ADR 0008, ADR 0001 |
12-a-module-repository.md |
A module repository, and what builds it | ADR 0009, ADR 0010, ADR 0005 |
13-credentials-and-their-rotation.md |
Credentials, and moving them without a consumer holding one the provider does not know about | ADR 0001, ADR 0009 |
14-model-access.md |
Model access as a provision, and what a licence is bound to | ADR 0024, ADR 0009 |
15-the-agent-session.md |
One mechanism started twice — a node's session and the mesh's | ADR 0004, ADR 0026 |
16-module-coverage.md |
What a module must be able to say, measured against 127 that exist | ADR 0009, ADR 0005 |
17-raising-a-mesh.md |
How a mesh comes into existence, and how a machine joins one that exists | ADR 0067, ADR 0006, ADR 0005 |
18-building-a-module.md |
How a build is modelled, and why a recipe that is always a Dockerfile does not fit what a module is | ADR 0040, ADR 0039, ADR 0009 |
19-the-module-protocol.md |
What a module's code and the mesh say to each other; an SDK is an implementation of it | ADR 0074, ADR 0042, ADR 0043 |
20-writing-a-module.md |
A worked guide: one module, four capabilities, four languages, and the packages it publishes | ADR 0074, ADR 0040, ADR 0039 |
21-the-installation-in-full.md |
Every step from a bare machine to a mesh that maintains itself, and what is not yet true | ADR 0067, ADR 0073, ADR 0014 |
22-the-work-ahead.md |
Everything decided and not yet built, in dependency order, each phase ending at a run | ADR 0074, ADR 0075, ADR 0014 |
23-choosing-a-provider.md |
Which of several providers of a kind serves a consumer, and when a module carries its own instead | ADR 0084, ADR 0027 |
24-the-secrets-vault.md |
The module that owns a secret — a secret provision, and the boundary of what it owns |
ADR 0085, ADR 0031, ADR 0048 |
Not yet written
- The remaining six contexts.
ADR 0006
settles the list at seven;
connectivityis the first written in full (08) and the other six do not exist yet. The work breakdown says in what order they are needed. Domain grouping outside the core.Not needed. ADR 0009 is superseded by ADR 0009: there is no domain module to group into, so there is no domain list to settle. Relationships are edges, and grouping is a tag and a query.