Files
hq/.claude/skills/hal-new-research/SKILL.md
T
jschoubben 702efca6bb Base layer: the mesh as it is, under the mesh as it should be
HQ held only the to-be. Every reader had to already know the system the
decisions were about, and an as-is claim had nowhere to live except inside
an intention.

Adds 02-DESIGN/00-as-is — eleven documents written from the implementation
and the operational record, not from intent, including the parts nobody
would choose again. The two existing designs move under 01-to-be. Layers
are declared in frontmatter and never mix: a design that ships does not
move, its as-is counterpart is written, and both stand.

Back-fills adr/0001-0014 for decisions taken in implementation and never
recorded — the broker, the module abstraction, the mesh database, managed
files, provisioning, migrations, the workspace removal, failing loudly,
the constitution, application placement, linking, the employee model, the
artifact, the three silos. Each marked reconstructed, dated from the
history, and citing the evidence it was recovered from. The two existing
records renumber to 0015 and 0016 so the ledger runs oldest first;
0017 extends 0015 to modules outside the core, principle only — the
domain list is deliberately not invented here.

how-we-build.md becomes the source of the mesh constitution, with a sync
playbook, so the enforced copy stops being the only one that is true.

Process becomes explicit: five playbooks, eight thin skills that defer to
them, a repository map, and AGENTS.md with CLAUDE.md as its include.

The five Observations become 04-ISSUES 001-005 where they can be owned and
closed. 006 is new and uncomfortable: HQ is not indexed into the knowledge
base. That claim is what decision 27 rests on, it was never checked, and
the README now says so instead of repeating it.

Also corrects the ADR index into something generated, the "02-DESIGN is
empty" claim, the VISION.md pointer that did not survive the repo split,
and a note asserting the symlink rule was contradicted — it was a
misreading; the rule forbids hand-made links, the installer links by design.
2026-08-23 03:08:26 +02:00

1.5 KiB

name, description
name description
hal-new-research Use when starting a new research effort in hal-hq — an idea, technology or approach worth investigating before it is committed to design. Triggers on "research X", "investigate X", "spike X", "should we use X", "is X worth doing".

hal-new-research

Scaffolds a new research effort. Authoritative playbook: 00-GENESIS/process/01-research.md — read it; this skill only does the mechanical setup.

Steps

  1. Find the next free number: list 01-RESEARCH/NNN-*, take the highest plus one, zero-padded to three digits.

  2. Create 01-RESEARCH/NNN-descriptive-name/ (kebab-case from the topic).

  3. Create status.md in it with exactly this frontmatter, then a prose summary of what is being investigated, why, and what it touches:

    ---
    status: ongoing
    initiated: YYYY-MM-DD
    touches: []
    became: []
    ---
    
  4. Do the research in further documents in the same folder. Keep the summary current.

Do not

  • Do not restate the status in prose. It lives in frontmatter, in one place.
  • Do not fill became: while the effort is open — hal-graduate sets it at closure.
  • Do not skip or reuse a sequence number.
  • Do not write into 02-DESIGN from an open effort.
  • Do not name the mesh being observed. Evidence is required; identification is forbidden.

Closing

An effort never just stops. It closes through hal-graduate as graduated or abandoned, always with became: pointing at what it turned into. Nothing is deleted.