jschoubben
7b4916e9ec
The architecture 0117 opened needs a module to offer a service as a role on the bus — one holder, addressed by what it does. A closed table in the controller cannot express that: a capability a module contributes would require changing the mesh itself. But 0110 closed the set for a good reason — nothing could say what seats a mesh had, and the hand count came out at eleven of thirteen. That argues for enumerable, not hardcoded, and 0110 weighed free-form against a fixed table without considering a third option: closed at any moment and derived from the catalogue. A derived list cannot drift, which is how the count broke. So: the mesh's seats stay the mesh's, reserved by the mesh- prefix so the prefix is the rule and there is no list to maintain; ten seats are renamed to restore 0079's convention; everything 0110 decided about what a seat IS survives untouched. Design 29 carries the declaration model: three namespaces, subjects derived from local names so a manifest survives the wire changing, queues never declared, five relationships (the job and state shapes 0041 had no room for), and the build-publish-deploy lifecycle with hard, soft and build-time dependencies distinguished. 0041 gets a progressive insight: "no per-consumer setup, only a subscription" was a fact about a topic exchange, and a JetStream durable consumer is a real object someone creates. WBS 1.3/1.4 were wrong and say so: streams come at registration and consumers at assignment, so only the foundation set belongs at genesis.
03-DESIGN
The authoritative specification. Implementation is built against what is written here.
Two layers
| Folder | What it is |
|---|---|
00-as-is/ |
The mesh that exists today. Shipped behaviour, described as it is — including behaviour nobody would choose again. |
01-to-be/ |
The mesh being built toward. Every statement traceable to a record in 02-DECISIONS/. |
They are never mixed. A statement about the future does not belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.
When a to-be design ships, it does not move. Its as-is counterpart is written or updated,
the to-be document's status becomes implemented, and both stand — one describing what runs,
the other recording what was intended. Deleting the intention loses the reasoning, which is
the expensive half.
Frontmatter
Every design document (not the READMEs) carries:
---
layer: as-is | to-be
status: designed | in-progress | implemented | abandoned
code: [] # owning code repo(s), from 00-META/repos.md
updated: YYYY-MM-DD # date of the last status change, not of text edits
decisions: [] # 02-DECISIONS/ records this document rests on
---
For an as-is document, status: implemented is the normal state — it describes something that
runs — and code: names where that implementation lives.
Status changes when implementation state changes, never because design text was edited. An
implemented claim must be defensible from the owning repository's main branch, not from
intent. If it cannot be checked, it is in-progress.
Cross-cutting views are generated from this frontmatter by the hq-status skill and never
written to disk.
What belongs here
Functional analysis, architectural description, and specification — prose and diagrams
only, no code. A manifest field may be named; a manifest may not be pasted. A document
enters the to-be layer only after the decision behind it is recorded in 02-DECISIONS/
and the research that produced it is closed.
Subfolders are encouraged where a layer grows enough to need them.