Files
hq/00-META/README.md
T
jschoubben c0b35652d0 The numbering is the flow: decisions are 02, design is 03
papa-hq reads 01 research -> 03 decision -> 02 design. The order is a
scar, not a choice: 02-DESIGN existed from its initial commit, and when
adr/ was finally promoted on 2026-07-13 it took the next free number
rather than its place in the sequence. By then design was too settled to
renumber.

hal-hq was three commits old, so it is not. adr/ becomes 02-DECISIONS and
02-DESIGN becomes 03-DESIGN, and following the folder numbers now walks
the process in the order it happens: research produces a decision, the
decision authorises a design.

00-GENESIS becomes 00-META, matching papa's rename from the same
restructure.

Every path reference rewritten across documents, frontmatter, playbooks
and skills. All links resolve; all 58 frontmatter blocks parse and their
path fields still point at files that exist.
2026-08-23 18:05:11 +02:00

3.1 KiB

00-META

The northern star. What HAL is, the environment it runs in, and what changes when it works. Every research effort and design decision is checked against this folder.

File / folder Purpose
mission.md Vision, mission, and the values that decide arguments
context.md The environment — conditions, not aspirations
effect.md What is different when the work is done
how-we-build.md The rules that hold across the mesh, each one earned. The source of the mesh constitution — the governed page the mesh injects into design sessions is derived from it.
repos.md Where implementation lives, and what each repository owns
process/ The playbooks — how work moves through this repository, for engineers and agents alike

Rules

  • Markdown only.
  • Stable by nature. Changes here reflect a genuine shift in intent, not iteration. The one exception is how-we-build.md, which changes whenever a rule is earned — and only through its amendment process.
  • Research and design must be traceable back to what is written here.
  • Instance-agnostic. These documents describe the mesh as a concept. No machine names, no counts, no topology.

On the architecture overview in the code repository

The code repository carries an architecture overview predating this folder. It is a useful description of how the mesh works, and its content now lives — anonymised and checked against the implementation — in 03-DESIGN/00-as-is/. GENESIS answers why; that document answered how, which is the design layer's job.

It had also drifted from the implementation in ways worth recording, since both were found by comparing it against the code rather than by anyone noticing:

  • It described the pipeline as having a separate builder process and a build stage that packages. Neither was true after 2026-08-04; the documents stayed stale until 2026-08-06 (ADR 0014).
  • It listed the mesh as spanning a fixed number of named machines, which is exactly the content this repository cannot carry.

It also lists "symlinks, not copies" as a key design principle, and that is a genuine contradiction rather than a stale detail. The mesh's stated intent is that it creates no symlinks at all — the rule is not merely "only the installer may link", and a founding document elevating linking to a principle points the opposite way from where this is going.

What exists today is that the installer owns and reconciles every link (ADR 0011) — an as-is fact, recorded in 03-DESIGN/00-as-is/05-runtime-and-installation.md. Centralising who may link narrowed the incident class; it did not close it. The intent is to remove the mechanism, recorded as ADR 0018.

A founding document contradicting the direction of travel is precisely the failure this folder exists to prevent.