Files
hq/03-DESIGN
jschoubben daf3e17c32 self-hosting, provisioning and delivery efforts, and the dotfiles origin
The identity provider is settled as not-substrate: the mesh does not
require one, tier 2 authenticates natively, and it is a hosted service
like any other. Four substrate services, not five. The tier test's second
step gains the verb that matters — can the control plane START without it,
not function fully without it.

That verb answers the forge and the registries. They are not substrate and
they are not duplicated: the control plane starts and manages nodes
without a forge, it just cannot change itself. One gitea module, tier 4,
and the mesh's own instance is distinguished by what it is bound to rather
than by being a different module — the same answer as postgres, from the
same test. It also buys a property worth having: if the forge dies the
mesh keeps running.

Delivery needing them is not an upward dependency, resolved the way the
constitution already says to: tier 2 declares requirements, tier 4
provides implementations, the binding is data. The mechanism is
provisioning, and the new idea is that the control plane is itself a
consumer.

Self-hosting therefore becomes a state the mesh REACHES, not a
precondition. A first node comes up from pinned external artifacts and
re-binds to internal providers once they exist. Today's mesh assumes the
second state from the first moment, which is why the first-node path needs
a script that papers over an impossibility and is the least-exercised code
in the system. Made explicit, the transition is also reversible.

Research 007 and 008 opened for the two areas flagged as important and
complex, scoped from the weaknesses the as-is layer already documents
rather than started blank.

And the origin: this began as a dotfiles repository. The first two days
adopt dotfiles, add per-node overrides, and introduce service symlinking
with an ignore file. The flat one-directory-per-tool catalogue, linking
over copying, adoption of already-configured machines, per-node overrides
and the desktop modules are all inherited rather than chosen for a mesh.
That is the single most useful fact for anyone changing the catalogue, it
strengthens ADR 0018 — the case for links was never made for a mesh — and
it explains research 005's silent fifty: dotfiles-era entries for one tool
never shared a domain because they never had one.
2026-08-23 20:55:14 +02:00
..

03-DESIGN

The authoritative specification. Implementation is built against what is written here.

Two layers

Folder What it is
00-as-is/ The mesh that exists today. Shipped behaviour, described as it is — including behaviour nobody would choose again.
01-to-be/ The mesh being built toward. Every statement traceable to a record in 02-DECISIONS/.

They are never mixed. A statement about the future does not belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.

When a to-be design ships, it does not move. Its as-is counterpart is written or updated, the to-be document's status becomes implemented, and both stand — one describing what runs, the other recording what was intended. Deleting the intention loses the reasoning, which is the expensive half.

Frontmatter

Every design document (not the READMEs) carries:

---
layer: as-is | to-be
status: designed | in-progress | implemented | abandoned
code: []                 # owning code repo(s), from 00-META/repos.md
updated: YYYY-MM-DD      # date of the last status change, not of text edits
decisions: []            # 02-DECISIONS/ records this document rests on
---

For an as-is document, status: implemented is the normal state — it describes something that runs — and code: names where that implementation lives.

Status changes when implementation state changes, never because design text was edited. An implemented claim must be defensible from the owning repository's main branch, not from intent. If it cannot be checked, it is in-progress.

Cross-cutting views are generated from this frontmatter by the hal-status skill and never written to disk.

What belongs here

Functional analysis, architectural description, and specification — prose and diagrams only, no code. A manifest field may be named; a manifest may not be pasted. A document enters the to-be layer only after the decision behind it is recorded in 02-DECISIONS/ and the research that produced it is closed.

Subfolders are encouraged where a layer grows enough to need them.