jochen
8e27116cd0
The predecessor's agent module was retired and its six files stayed on both workstations telling every session to use tools that no longer exist. Before a successor module is written, the design needs the decisions it rests on and nothing in the record stated them: - ADR 0169 (reconstructed) records what the controller shipped on 2026-09-27 without a record: the operator account is a node fact stated by the operator, the home is derived unless stated, a resource may be placed under it owned by the account, and a node with no account refuses one. - ADR 0170 generalises to-be 29 §3's found-vs-owned boundary to every directory under a home: the module owns the directory and the files it places, writes into the tool's own files for its few keys, never declares a credential's content, and holds everything else as found — a predecessor's leftovers included, which the operator removes once. - ADR 0171 draws the licence line the operator asked to have drawn rather than assumed: the mesh binds and delivers (to-be 14 and 15 stand), the module alone writes the credential file, refresh stays central (ADR 0050), a switch is the binding changed through a controller seat verb asked for via the console, and the token-carrying shell helper is retired. The controller learns nothing about the agent; that is what "no part" means. To-be 36 is the module's design: the ownership map per path, the fate of the six predecessor files, what the three instruction documents say, the licence tools and skill, the console as a node-scoped provision, the package gap stated honestly, and the order of the build. To-be 14, 29 and 34 carry dated notes; the glossary gains "operator account".
00-META
The northern star. What the mesh is, the environment it runs in, and what changes when it works — plus the engineering practice that holds across everything Novox builds. Every research effort and design decision is checked against this folder.
| File / folder | Purpose |
|---|---|
mission.md |
Vision, mission, and the values that decide arguments |
context.md |
The environment — conditions, not aspirations |
effect.md |
What is different when the work is done |
how-we-build.md |
The rules that hold across the mesh, each one earned. The source of the mesh constitution — the governed page the mesh injects into design sessions is derived from it. |
glossary.md |
One name per thing — the authority on vocabulary, and the words that were retired |
repos.md |
Where implementation lives, and what each repository owns |
process/ |
The playbooks — how work moves through this repository, for engineers and agents alike |
Rules
- Markdown only.
- Stable by nature. Changes here reflect a genuine shift in intent, not iteration. The one
exception is
how-we-build.md, which changes whenever a rule is earned — and only through its amendment process. - Research and design must be traceable back to what is written here.
- Instance-agnostic. These documents describe the mesh as a concept. No machine names, no counts, no topology.
On the architecture overview in the code repository
The code repository carries an architecture overview predating this folder. It is a useful
description of how the mesh works, and its content now lives — anonymised and checked against
the implementation — in 03-DESIGN/00-as-is/. GENESIS answers why;
that document answered how, which is the design layer's job.
It had also drifted from the implementation in ways worth recording, since both were found by comparing it against the code rather than by anyone noticing:
- It described the pipeline as having a separate builder process and a build stage that packages. Neither was true after 2026-08-04; the documents stayed stale until 2026-08-06 (ADR 0010).
- It listed the mesh as spanning a fixed number of named machines, which is exactly the content this repository cannot carry.
It also lists "symlinks, not copies" as a key design principle, and that is a genuine contradiction rather than a stale detail. The mesh's stated intent is that it creates no symlinks at all — the rule is not merely "only the installer may link", and a founding document elevating linking to a principle points the opposite way from where this is going.
What exists today is that the installer owns and reconciles every link
(ADR 0012) — an as-is fact, recorded in
03-DESIGN/00-as-is/05-runtime-and-installation.md.
Centralising who may link narrowed the incident class; it did not close it. The intent is to
remove the mechanism, recorded as ADR 0012.
A founding document contradicting the direction of travel is precisely the failure this folder exists to prevent.