jochen
8e27116cd0
The predecessor's agent module was retired and its six files stayed on both workstations telling every session to use tools that no longer exist. Before a successor module is written, the design needs the decisions it rests on and nothing in the record stated them: - ADR 0169 (reconstructed) records what the controller shipped on 2026-09-27 without a record: the operator account is a node fact stated by the operator, the home is derived unless stated, a resource may be placed under it owned by the account, and a node with no account refuses one. - ADR 0170 generalises to-be 29 §3's found-vs-owned boundary to every directory under a home: the module owns the directory and the files it places, writes into the tool's own files for its few keys, never declares a credential's content, and holds everything else as found — a predecessor's leftovers included, which the operator removes once. - ADR 0171 draws the licence line the operator asked to have drawn rather than assumed: the mesh binds and delivers (to-be 14 and 15 stand), the module alone writes the credential file, refresh stays central (ADR 0050), a switch is the binding changed through a controller seat verb asked for via the console, and the token-carrying shell helper is retired. The controller learns nothing about the agent; that is what "no part" means. To-be 36 is the module's design: the ownership map per path, the fate of the six predecessor files, what the three instruction documents say, the licence tools and skill, the console as a node-scoped provision, the package gap stated honestly, and the order of the build. To-be 14, 29 and 34 carry dated notes; the glossary gains "operator account".
03-DESIGN
The authoritative specification. Implementation is built against what is written here.
Two layers
| Folder | What it is |
|---|---|
00-as-is/ |
The mesh that exists today. Shipped behaviour, described as it is — including behaviour nobody would choose again. |
01-to-be/ |
The mesh being built toward. Every statement traceable to a record in 02-DECISIONS/. |
They are never mixed. A statement about the future does not belong in an as-is document, and an as-is document is never edited to describe an intention.
When a to-be design ships, it does not move. Its as-is counterpart is written or updated,
the to-be document's status becomes implemented, and both stand — one describing what runs,
the other recording what was intended. Deleting the intention loses the reasoning, which is
the expensive half.
Frontmatter
Every design document (not the READMEs) carries:
---
layer: as-is | to-be
status: designed | in-progress | implemented | abandoned
code: [] # owning code repo(s), from 00-META/repos.md
updated: YYYY-MM-DD # date of the last status change, not of text edits
decisions: [] # 02-DECISIONS/ records this document rests on
---
For an as-is document, status: implemented is the normal state — it describes something that
runs — and code: names where that implementation lives.
Status changes when implementation state changes, never because design text was edited. An
implemented claim must be defensible from the owning repository's main branch, not from
intent. If it cannot be checked, it is in-progress.
Cross-cutting views are generated from this frontmatter by the hq-status skill and never
written to disk.
What belongs here
Functional analysis, architectural description, and specification — prose and diagrams
only, no code. A manifest field may be named; a manifest may not be pasted. A document
enters the to-be layer only after the decision behind it is recorded in 02-DECISIONS/
and the research that produced it is closed.
Subfolders are encouraged where a layer grows enough to need them.