jschoubben
cb1b055b80
The review by architectural domain found that readers of the seat list would name the indexer, never hear a removal, could deadlock a full restart, and that any folder could define a seat again; the-private-network's holder sat in mesh-sdk. ADR 0636 and the lead's rulings answer these, and the designs must say so before develop. - design 26: the seat list through a verb and two events of mesh-catalog; a reader without it acts on nothing new; a seat defined only in its domain's contracts module; states are any holder's, caller-written only for events and logs, each with its size cap, declared in the holder's requires; the renames move no state; the group's check reads every member's head; Connectivity in the mesh-networking repository, held by mesh-wireguard; acceptance tests by level and repository; two stale table rows corrected - design 47: the composer in mesh-delivery-sdk, the bus composer's seat parts in the grants part, placement's contract and check by their seat - design 20: a module's own package is fingerprinted by its own files - glossary: mesh-placement retired for tool descriptions too; the composition renamed to mesh-delivery-sdk's; six seats given their domains Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
00-META
The northern star. What the mesh is, the environment it runs in, and what changes when it works — plus the engineering practice that holds across everything Novox builds. Every research effort and design decision is checked against this folder.
| File / folder | Purpose |
|---|---|
mission.md |
Vision, mission, and the values that decide arguments |
context.md |
The environment — conditions, not aspirations |
effect.md |
What is different when the work is done |
how-we-build.md |
The rules that hold across the mesh, each one earned. The source of the mesh constitution — the governed page the mesh injects into design sessions is derived from it. |
glossary.md |
One name per thing — the authority on vocabulary, and the words that were retired |
repos.md |
Where implementation lives, and what each repository owns |
process/ |
The playbooks — how work moves through this repository, for engineers and agents alike |
Rules
- Markdown only, but for the checks and one drawn overview of the playbooks (
process/playbooks.html). - Stable by nature. Changes here reflect a genuine shift in intent, not iteration. The one
exception is
how-we-build.md, which changes whenever a rule is earned — and only through its amendment process. - Research and design must be traceable back to what is written here.
- Instance-agnostic. These documents describe the mesh as a concept. No machine names, no counts, no topology.
On the architecture overview in the code repository
The code repository carries an architecture overview predating this folder. It is a useful
description of how the mesh works, and its content now lives — anonymised and checked against
the implementation — in 03-DESIGN/00-as-is/. GENESIS answers why;
that document answered how, which is the design layer's job.
It had also drifted from the implementation in ways worth recording, since both were found by comparing it against the code rather than by anyone noticing:
- It described the pipeline as having a separate builder process and a build stage that packages. Neither was true after 2026-08-04; the documents stayed stale until 2026-08-06 (ADR 0010).
- It listed the mesh as spanning a fixed number of named machines, which is exactly the content this repository cannot carry.
It also lists "symlinks, not copies" as a key design principle, and that is a genuine contradiction rather than a stale detail. The mesh's stated intent is that it creates no symlinks at all — the rule is not merely "only the installer may link", and a founding document elevating linking to a principle points the opposite way from where this is going.
What exists today is that the installer owns and reconciles every link
(ADR 0012) — an as-is fact, recorded in
03-DESIGN/00-as-is/05-runtime-and-installation.md.
Centralising who may link narrowed the incident class; it did not close it. The intent is to
remove the mechanism, recorded as ADR 0012.
A founding document contradicting the direction of travel is precisely the failure this folder exists to prevent.