Files
hq/04-ISSUES
jochen 4beb6629db Issue 113: ground the rebuildability point in what the design actually says
Review of my own text found an unattributed claim — "the mesh's claim that a node
can be rebuilt from its declarations" — which is not a stated principle anywhere.
Replaced with the design position that genuinely covers it: to-be 07 chooses
references over payload because "reproducibility comes from pinning the identity of
a thing rather than carrying its bytes". This incident is that choice's failure mode
when the identity stops resolving, which is a sharper point than the one I made.

Scope stated honestly: the passage is about the foundation bundle and this module is
not in it, but pin-identity-fetch-bytes is how every module gets third-party images.

Also names the tension the mirroring question actually carries — mirroring is a move
away from references-over-payload, so it is a decision, not a fix.
2026-09-24 15:44:44 +02:00
..

04-ISSUES

The front door for "something is wrong" at the level of the mesh's design or governance. Diagnosis happens here, where the whole mesh is in view; the fix lands in the owning code repository.

What belongs here

Belongs here Belongs in the knowledge base
The design permits a failure to be silent How to fix one occurrence of it
A documented rule is enforced by nothing A command that works around it
A stated invariant is false in practice A node-specific quirk
The owner is unknown and finding it needs the whole mesh in view Symptom → fix, once the answer is known

The knowledge base already holds the operational record and is indexed on symptoms. This folder is not a second copy of it. An issue here is a question HQ must answer; an entry there is an incident someone must clear. An issue whose answer is a general lesson belongs in both.

Structure

NNN-short-name/
  00-report.md      the symptom as observed, with the evidence; status in frontmatter
  01-diagnosis.md   the investigation trail, dated, including what was ruled out

Frontmatter, on 00-report.md

---
status: open | diagnosing | located | resolved | wontfix
opened: YYYY-MM-DD
located-in: []       # owning repo(s) or module(s), filled by diagnosis
fixed-by:            # pull request or commit reference, filled at resolution
amended-design:      # design doc path, when the root cause was a design gap
---

Rules

  • Anyone may open an issue. No localisation is required to report one.
  • The full flow is playbook 00-META/process/03-issues.md.
  • Closed issues are never deleted — they are the mesh's symptom-to-component memory.
  • wontfix is legitimate and requires a sentence saying why.