mesh-knowledge: ask changes in the review for a decision nothing would cite, so its acceptance never turns the module unhealthy (hq issue 504)
The whole-set rule cited ran only after acceptance: the review approved a decision with no home and no record linking it, the rule then failed, and the module's health turned red for a fault its author could only repair after the fact. hq held the rule at the record's own merge. The review now judges it ahead, before the judgement: such a decision stays proposed with a changes finding naming the rule. It is not refused at propose, because no record can link a number only reserved.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ as text. `get` serves each, and any other field a record of hq wrote under `fiel
|
||||
A failure is kept as a finding and makes the module unhealthy, so the mesh raises a condition naming the rule
|
||||
and the records. The acceptance stands.
|
||||
|
||||
`cited` is also judged ahead, in the review: a decision that names no home and that no accepted (or
|
||||
superseded) record links is not judged and not accepted. Its review, by the knowledge base itself, asks changes
|
||||
naming the rule (hq issue 504). It is not refused at propose, because no record can link a number only
|
||||
reserved: a record citing a new one is proposed after it and accepted, and the new one is proposed again.
|
||||
|
||||
## The import
|
||||
|
||||
`import` reads hq through the records module at the commit its checkout stands at. With `commit`, it refuses a
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user