mesh-delivery-gate and gitea: a setting check-gates-merge; false asks a reviewed pull request's Approve and merges it without waiting for mesh/check
mesh/delivery held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides what follows
mesh/check pass 32ad59fc6402 on 609013a2638f | unit 2010 run, 2322 kept, 5 skipped | integration 2032 run, 2341 kept, 9 skipped | over bound: unit, in…
mesh/delivery held for a person: merged without a passing check: only a person decides what follows
mesh/check pass 32ad59fc6402 on 609013a2638f | unit 2010 run, 2322 kept, 5 skipped | integration 2032 run, 2341 kept, 9 skipped | over bound: unit, in…
The operator, 2026-10-25 22:56: "run the check locally only, but not as a gate, it loses us too much time". Tonight each merge ask waited 3-7 minutes for mesh/check, and every merge into main refused the next approved merge for a check judged on the trunk before (mesh-delivery#52). Both settings default to true, so nothing changes until the operator sets them. False: the gate makes a reviewed pull request ready and asks its Approve with no verdict, a trunk's move puts nothing out of date, a verdict is kept and shown, and a group still merges in one pass; the merge tool merges a head the Approve names whatever its mesh/check says. delivery_status and show say the mode.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -525,6 +525,18 @@ test("gitea_merge_pull_request judges mesh/check on a main requiring no status,
|
||||
|
||||
state.statuses = line(TRUNK);
|
||||
assert.equal(((await merge()) as Record<string, unknown>).merged, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// check-gates-merge false (the operator, 2026-10-25): a head the Approve names merges whatever its mesh/check says;
|
||||
// without approved_heads it is refused as before.
|
||||
const ungated = mergeTool(client, { gates, stateDir, emit: async () => {}, checkGates: () => false });
|
||||
const mergeUngated = (args: Record<string, unknown> = { approved_heads }) =>
|
||||
ungated.run({ owner: "novox", repo: "mesh-catalog", number: 7, head: REVIEWED, ...args });
|
||||
for (const statuses of [[], line(TRUNK, "pending", "checking"), line(TRUNK, "failure", "fail"), line(MOVED)]) {
|
||||
state.merged = false;
|
||||
state.statuses = statuses;
|
||||
await assert.rejects(mergeUngated({}), /Approve/);
|
||||
assert.equal(((await mergeUngated()) as Record<string, unknown>).merged, true, JSON.stringify(statuses));
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("a rule named for a branch is not made weaker than the glob rule that guards it now", async () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user