Name the two modules after their software: nftables and distribution
A module's identity is the software it is (ADR 0040). Two were named after the job instead, and the job already had a name. firewall installs the nftables package and runs nftables.service. The seat it claims is the-packet-filter, which is correctly named for the role. Calling the module firewall named neither the software nor the provision, and promised that any firewall could sit there — the false genericity the naming rule forbids. registry runs Distribution, the OCI reference implementation, and provides artifact-store. So registry was a third name for a thing that already had two, which is how one word ended up meaning the module, the software and the concept in the same paragraph. The capability stays firewall, and correctly: a capability IS a functionality, so a node having one and fail2ban requiring one are both right. Only the module moves. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01D6qtiYU3P9jk3pnAXyAFyx
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"compilerOptions": {
|
||||
"target": "ES2022",
|
||||
"module": "NodeNext",
|
||||
"moduleResolution": "NodeNext",
|
||||
"strict": true,
|
||||
"esModuleInterop": true,
|
||||
"skipLibCheck": true,
|
||||
"noEmit": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"include": [
|
||||
"client.ts",
|
||||
"tools/index.ts"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user