The artifact store's seat is one per mesh

Review of the registry work found it node-scoped: a second `distribution` on another
machine resolved cleanly there, and only afterwards did the mesh notice `artifact-store`
offered by two nodes, with every consumer elsewhere refusing to choose. Worse, a node-scoped
requirement with one candidate installs that candidate, so anything that wanted the store
beside it would have raised a fresh, empty store on the wrong machine first.

There is one store in a mesh, which was already the effective rule; the claim now says it
where a second one is assigned, by name, instead of leaving consumers to discover it.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-23 23:40:54 +02:00
parent 9f2c678355
commit 833d8ec3ec
+1 -1
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
"claims": [
{
"name": "the-artifact-store",
"scope": "node"
"scope": "mesh"
}
],
"capabilities": [