Read a provider's outcome per offer, and read route-proxy's and node-tools' entries, so provisions a helper does not answer stop failing and routed keys stop standing asked (issue 774)
mesh/delivery-group group fix/held-module-and-assigner-contract rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (c82f18b5e6bb): integr…
mesh/delivery closed: the pull request closed unmerged
mesh/check failed: integration: mesh-healers/cmd/mesh-healers.TestTheHealersWholeActOnTheBusAndBrake: never: the would-act written | b8ce4f0c0ac5 on 3…
mesh/delivery-group group fix/held-module-and-assigner-contract rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (c82f18b5e6bb): integr…
mesh/delivery closed: the pull request closed unmerged
mesh/check failed: integration: mesh-healers/cmd/mesh-healers.TestTheHealersWholeActOnTheBusAndBrake: never: the would-act written | b8ce4f0c0ac5 on 3…
The sweep of 2026-10-30 20:10: <node>.claude-code.gitea-read and <node>.mesh-build-node.npm-package-registry failed on all four nodes with "gitea does not serve": gitea's provider helper answers only forge-account and refuses every other bind into gitea.bound, and the provisioner took any entry of a module declaring `bound` as the outcome. And novox.gitea.route, novox.keycloak.route and <node>.claude-code.mcp-endpoint stood asked: route-proxy and node-tools keep entries the manifest did not read. Quick fix: add route-proxy.bound and node-tools.bound to the reads. Thorough fix: judge each offer by who answers it (answered-by: helper reads the entries, any other offer of a module that names a helper is judged by its have), and say on gitea's forge-account that the helper answers it. Chose both: the reads alone leave gitea's two provisions failed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -423,7 +423,8 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "forge-account",
|
||||
"credential": {"form": "none"},
|
||||
"scope": "mesh"
|
||||
"scope": "mesh",
|
||||
"answered-by": "helper"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"build": {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user