Refuse a daemon's line in what a module shows: the operator types nox (hq ADR 0272, issue 356)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds mesh-vault → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery failed: its walk failed: a gate on a first machine (what it carried put back), a build, a machine
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds mesh-vault → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery failed: its walk failed: a gate on a first machine (what it carried put back), a build, a machine
A condition told the operator to type the node-engine's binary at the machine, and nothing held the catalogue's texts to ADR 0272. The words check gains retired-lines — the controller's and the node-engine's commands, copied from hq's words.py --list lines, which compares it — and refuses one in any string a module's tools can show or any manifest description. The vault's and the route adapter's texts now say the nox line.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ export function getVaultTools(ledger: Ledger, receives: string | undefined, root
|
||||
"The mesh's root secrets as this vault keeps them: every secret a module holds for itself, " +
|
||||
"sealed to the operator's key (novox/hq ADR 0085, amended). Ciphertext — nothing here can " +
|
||||
"open a line of it; the operator, holding the private key off the mesh, recovers one with " +
|
||||
"`mesh-controller secret recover --from-export`. Also lists what is NOT recoverable: secrets " +
|
||||
"`nox secret recover --from-export` on the control-node. Also lists what is NOT recoverable: secrets " +
|
||||
"made before the mesh had an operator key.",
|
||||
input: {
|
||||
sealed: {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user