mesh-knowledge: review every proposal in a judgement of its own, and serve no review verb (hq issue 425, ADR 0290 as updated)
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
mesh/merge-gate pass: builds mesh-knowledge → novox; no bus step; every machine composes with the change as it did without (4 of 4 compose)
mesh/repo-check pass: its merge-check.sh passed, each part in its toolchain: merge-check.sh (go), merge-check-typescript.sh (typescript)
mesh/delivery superseded: a newer head of the same pull request
The mesh proves which machine called, not which agent on it (hq issue 365), so a review verb could not tell a reviewer from the author. Each version proposed is now judged by claude-code.claude_code_judge in a separate call that sees only the record, the records it links and the rules: approve accepts (or asks the operator for a needs-operator record), changes keeps it proposed with the findings for its author, and a judgement that cannot be had or read leaves it proposed, says so, and never counts as approval.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
|
||||
"history",
|
||||
"reserve",
|
||||
"propose",
|
||||
"review",
|
||||
"import",
|
||||
"return"
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +45,6 @@
|
||||
"history",
|
||||
"reserve",
|
||||
"propose",
|
||||
"review",
|
||||
"import",
|
||||
"return"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user