Bind the bus's monitoring inside its container, published on the machine's loopback alone

Bound to the container's own loopback, the published 127.0.0.1:8222 answered nothing; the nats tools had to go through docker exec.
2026-10-04 16:53:16 +02:00
parent 04b46f8bd1
commit ed695328e8
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
      "id": "server-conf",
      "type": "file",
      "path": "/var/lib/nats-module/conf/nats.conf",
-      "content": "# The nats module's own server settings. Declared by the module, because a port, a TLS path\n# and a store directory are properties of the container this module raises: they live in its\n# image and its mounts and change when it does.\n#\n# The mesh writes accounts.conf beside this one and nothing else. A controller that wrote the\n# whole file would have to be kept in step with a Dockerfile it never sees.\n\nport: 4222\nhttp: 127.0.0.1:8222\n\n# The mesh's own broker certificate — the one every machine already pins by fingerprint and the\n# controller already trusts (MESH_BROKER_CERTIFICATE). Serving the new bus with it means no\n# machine's pin changes when it moves, and no second certificate exists to be wrong about.\ntls {\n  cert_file: \"/tls/tls.crt\"\n  key_file: \"/tls/tls.key\"\n}\n\n# **No `verify`, deliberately, and it was `verify: true` until a probe ran this image.** That\n# setting makes the server demand a *client* certificate, and nothing in the mesh presents one: a\n# host pins this server's exact certificate and authenticates with the password the mesh minted\n# (novox/hq ADR 0004, design 25 §4), and so does a module's runtime. With it on, every connection\n# in the mesh is refused at the TLS handshake, before any password is looked at — and the error is\n# \"client didn't provide a certificate\", which reads as a client fault.\n#\n# TLS is still required: a tls block is what makes it required, and verify only decides whether\n# client certificates are checked. What is given up is a second factor the mesh has no machinery\n# to issue or rotate — a certificate per module per node — and what is kept is stronger than a\n# name check in both directions: an exact pin outward, a per-user password inward.\n\njetstream {\n  store_dir: \"/data\"\n}\n\n# Every user of the mesh, composed by the controller and rewritten whenever a module is\n# assigned, a node enrols or a person's access changes.\n#\n# **Relative, and in this same directory, because it has to be.** An absolute include path is\n# resolved relative to the including file's directory, not from the root: nats-server given\n# `include /etc/nats/accounts.conf` from /etc/nats-server/nats.conf looks for\n# /etc/nats-server/etc/nats/accounts.conf and refuses to start. Verified against the server.\ninclude accounts.conf\n",
+      "content": "# The nats module's own server settings. Declared by the module, because a port, a TLS path\n# and a store directory are properties of the container this module raises: they live in its\n# image and its mounts and change when it does.\n#\n# The mesh writes accounts.conf beside this one and nothing else. A controller that wrote the\n# whole file would have to be kept in step with a Dockerfile it never sees.\n\nport: 4222\n# Monitoring on every interface *inside* the container, so the publish below can reach it; the publish\n# is 127.0.0.1:8222 on the machine, so nothing beyond the machine reaches it, and the module guards 8222\n# too. Bound to the container's own loopback until 2026-10-04, the published port answered nothing\n# (connection reset), and the only way in was `docker exec`.\nhttp: 0.0.0.0:8222\n\n# The mesh's own broker certificate — the one every machine already pins by fingerprint and the\n# controller already trusts (MESH_BROKER_CERTIFICATE). Serving the new bus with it means no\n# machine's pin changes when it moves, and no second certificate exists to be wrong about.\ntls {\n  cert_file: \"/tls/tls.crt\"\n  key_file: \"/tls/tls.key\"\n}\n\n# **No `verify`, deliberately, and it was `verify: true` until a probe ran this image.** That\n# setting makes the server demand a *client* certificate, and nothing in the mesh presents one: a\n# host pins this server's exact certificate and authenticates with the password the mesh minted\n# (novox/hq ADR 0004, design 25 §4), and so does a module's runtime. With it on, every connection\n# in the mesh is refused at the TLS handshake, before any password is looked at — and the error is\n# \"client didn't provide a certificate\", which reads as a client fault.\n#\n# TLS is still required: a tls block is what makes it required, and verify only decides whether\n# client certificates are checked. What is given up is a second factor the mesh has no machinery\n# to issue or rotate — a certificate per module per node — and what is kept is stronger than a\n# name check in both directions: an exact pin outward, a per-user password inward.\n\njetstream {\n  store_dir: \"/data\"\n}\n\n# Every user of the mesh, composed by the controller and rewritten whenever a module is\n# assigned, a node enrols or a person's access changes.\n#\n# **Relative, and in this same directory, because it has to be.** An absolute include path is\n# resolved relative to the including file's directory, not from the root: nats-server given\n# `include /etc/nats/accounts.conf` from /etc/nats-server/nats.conf looks for\n# /etc/nats-server/etc/nats/accounts.conf and refuses to start. Verified against the server.\ninclude accounts.conf\n",
      "mode": "0644"
    },
    {