retire takes the definition's warrant (the hand act's id, naming node, module, name and ask) and answers
retired; own-retired, renamed, retiring and retired carry exactly the definition's bodies on its subjects.
The whole-module tests decode what the module published strictly into the generated types. The modules
require mesh-contracts, to be pinned with the group (a local replace in an uncommitted go.work until then).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
The caller must be on the vault's trusted list retire-callers (the holder of mesh-config alone) and carry
a hand act it recorded for exactly this node, module and name. A waiter on rotated or own-replaced does
not wake on own-retired. Reviewer note of issue 1966: HandedOf returns a placement read error instead of
dropping the modules placed there.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
The built binary, played as the node's tool runtime over a real bus: a renamed value moves and both
names answer, the module restarted inside the window keeps it and says renamed once, a refused move
writes its finding, g14's window closes on delivered, a value no manifest reads is asked about once
when no node reads it and removed only on the Approve.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
A declaration's renamed-from moves the value with its trust and opens a window per node,
closed on delivered and, for a returning node-engine, on manifest-reads-changed (ADR 0618).
A value no manifest reads is marked retiring only once no node runs a build that reads it,
asked once, removed only on the Approve (a secret through the seat mesh-vault's retire).
New state in the old sections (ADR 0619), the stream config-events, the tools config_renames,
config_rename_again, config_rename_close, config_retiring and the seat verb renames.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
mesh/check being carried to 237a534ca4d3 on 7a7db0166ad2 | from dd458cb155f5, mesh-host 4d47ff5ce743
The vault leaves a handed module's own secrets out of `own`, judged by the plan in its assignment, and nothing read
that judgement: on 2026-11-04 the circle on ace (no plan, so not handed, so refused, so no plan) could be told only by
reading the provisioner's plans beside the node-engine's refusals. own_handed answers, per module the vault keeps an
own secret of on the machine or that is placed there, handed or not and why.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KJNrH5EgFXMKKYSrig
mesh/check checking 6c09be4a703e on dd458cb155f5 | novox/mesh-catalog#605 in group feat/l3-final
The test of a node coming back stops the client before the report of zsh is kept; the cancelled Put left s.applied without zsh, so leftModules never removed it (2 of 20 runs failed under -race, also at origin/main). Thorough: report() keeps under context.WithoutCancel with a 5 s bound; the same test now passes 40 of 40.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
The running indexer holds refusals from 21:14 for the exact bytes of these manifests, which carry core-credentials again. A new digest is read afresh; the thorough fix of stale verdicts is in the indexer in this group (issue 774).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
mesh/delivery-group group feat/l3-final rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (278aa5f0ccbe): unit: mesh-provisioner-client/…
mesh/check failed (2): unit: mesh-provisioner-client/cmd/mesh-provisioner-client.TestNatsANodeComingBackFil…; and 1 more | 093967af9b2f on be24f5ac387f
mesh/check being carried to f2eb54820469 on be24f5ac387f | from e6de42630355, mesh-delivery 4154c3040cee, mesh-tools 01ee2ef39488
The running indexer's judge refuses the word, a refused manifest holds the bus's user list, and so the indexer build
that knows the word is never granted. The node-engine on main still finds these modules by its name list, and the
vault keeps no list, so no credential is lost; the word comes back once the new judge runs (issue 774).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JG73KG7AfSdh6FP8VrBqCn
A provider whose build does not offer the provision it was asked for must
not be counted as having delivered it; the provisioner reads the build's
manifest (the builds read serves only this offer check and makes no plan,
ADR 0593 section 8) before it takes the provider's have as the outcome.
mesh/check failed (60): integration: mesh-knowledge/cmd/mesh-knowledge.TestARecordThatNeedsTheOperatorIsAc…; and 59 more | 7c78fd2e0c4f on f469eb387a30
A pass runs on every change of its node, and a newly placed module stays
unpublished for the minutes its build takes, so counting passes made every
new placement unhealthy while nothing was wrong. The health now says a hold
only once a module has stayed unpublished at one build for longer than 45
minutes (the build step's bound is 30), with since when; a published module
or another build starts the clock again.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
A node-wide hold while any module's composition was unpublished meant one
placed module whose newest build never completes blocked every retirement on
its node for good, said only as a line of the pass. The incomplete first read
is already covered by the load gate, and an unpublished module's own plan and
keys are already kept as held. So the node-wide hold goes; a removed consumer
retires beside an unpublished module, and a module held unpublished for more
than two passes in a row is said on provisioner_health with its build.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
At 2026-11-02 22:55:58 the provisioner's first pass after a new membership read
part of the picture, took the modules missing from it as handing nothing, set
21 route keys of running web apps retiring and asked the operator to remove
them; 3 s later the next pass put every plan back. Only 3 asks reached the
router; the other 18 were refused yet counted asked. Third of its kind (937,
1332), so the kind is fixed, not the instance.
Quick fix: wait for the watched reads' first load before any pass.
Thorough fix, chosen because the kind recurred three times and its obvious
answer would cut running apps off their routes:
- no pass judges before placement, wants, haves, the indexer's modules and the
published compositions have loaded once; a read error fails the pass
instead of reading as empty;
- while a module's composition is not published at its build, no key on that
node turns retiring and no plan is removed; a placed module with no known
build is held, not counted as handing nothing;
- a key whose consumer still has a want or a have on the node and no plan read
in this pass is left as it is;
- a pass that would retire most of a node's consumers at once (more than 3, or
more than half and at least 2) retires and asks nothing and says it as a
fault through provisioner_health (runtime-health, so a condition names the
likely cause); provisioner_compose retire-many is the operator's word that
such a removal is meant;
- at most 3 asks stand open (the router's bound per asker); the rest wait and
are raised as one ends, and an ask the router holds no record of a minute on
is raised again.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
mesh/delivery-group group feat/sdk1 rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (6b0f5a2e9397): integration: meshbuildgo/cmd/mesh-…
mesh/check failed: integration: meshbuildgo/cmd/mesh-build-go… | 68e7a2ddbfb9 on ee75d4327ce5 | judged by the candidate's mesh-build-go at 773f299aed81
mesh/delivery-group group feat/sdk1 rejected: composed together: the checker's verdict at the members' heads (5c08034be629): integration: meshbuildgo/cmd/mesh-…
mesh/check failed: integration: meshbuildgo/cmd/mesh-build-go… | 640455999e66 on ee75d4327ce5 | judged by the candidate's mesh-build-go at 785ebb388d5a
ensureModfile copied go.mod word for word into pins/<dir>/, where `go mod verify` runs, so a replace to ./x or ../x pointed
nowhere (route-proxy's failure of 2026-11-02 13:53, met a second time with the release's sibling packages). Every relative
replace target is now made absolute under the tree the go.mod came from. mesh-build-node installs a module's own npm
packages in a scratch copy of package.json, so a file:, link: or portal: dependency on a relative path would fail the same
way; it is refused naming the package and its path, as a module without a lock is.
Quick fix: rewrite the one replace route-proxy had, in ensureModfile (minutes). Thorough fix: the kind, a go.mod or
package.json copied away from its tree, for every replace form (single, block, with a version, ./ and ../) in the one place
all copies go through (ensureModfile, which versions.go and the pins share), and the same kind in the other build module
that copies a manifest. Chosen: thorough, since it was met twice and hides a failure until the delivery (quick-or-thorough,
fix-a-bug-met-twice). Test: TestARelativeReplaceStillResolvesInTheTemporaryModfile runs real go mod verify in the pins directory.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NcbgfJ9Gum47zkFKWRaovL
jschoubben